Submitted by user on
Study Name
Chicago Section 8 Housing Vouchers
Study Sharepoint ID
24960
Evaluation name
The effects of housing assistance on labor supply
Intervention (standard name)
Strength of Evidence Tag
Reason for the Rating

This study received a high study quality rating because it is a low-attrition randomized controlled trial with no known issues that suggest the findings cannot be attributed to the intervention.

This study received a high study quality rating because it is a low-attrition randomized controlled trial with no known issues that suggest the findings cannot be attributed to the intervention.

Services
Settings in which the intervention was studied
Count age
0
Count Young Adults
0
Count Hard-to-employ
0
Count Disability
0
Count chronically ill
0
Count mentally ill
0
Count substance dependent
0
Count formerly incarcerated
0
Count Justice involved
0
Count limited work history
0
Count homeless
0
Count immigrants
0
Count refugees
0
Count veterans
0
Count female
0
Count Male
0
Count Any postsecondary education
0
Count With a high school diploma or GED
0
Count No high school diploma or GED
0
Count Married
0
Count Parents
0
Count Single Parents
0
Count Non-Custodial Parents
0
Count Employed
0
Count Self employed
0
Count Unemployed
0
Count Disconnected/discouraged workers
0
Count general low-income population
0
Count Very low income (as classified by the authors)
0
Count welfare population
0
Count long-term welfare recipients
0
Count Asian
0
Count Black or African American
0
Count Hispanic or Latino of any race
0
Count American Indian or Alaska Native
0
Count Pacific islander
0
Count White
0
Count More than one race
0
Count Unknown race
0
Count another race
0
Percent female
87.80
Percent Male
12.20
Percent Married
8.80
Percent Employed
56.50
Percent welfare population
40.50
Percent general low-income population
100.00
Percent Black or African American
94.30
Percent Hispanic or Latino of any race
3.50
Percent White
3.30
Percent Unknown or not reported
0.40
Mean age
32.00
Group formation formatted

The study focuses on families in Chicago that applied to receive Section 8 housing vouchers from Chicago Housing Authority Corporation, Inc. (CHAC) in July 1997. All income-eligible applicants were randomly assigned positions on a waiting list in August 1997, and those on the waiting list were offered a voucher when one became available. A total of 82,607 families applied and were determined to be eligible for a voucher based on their income. The first 35,000 applicants were put on an active waiting list, and the first 18,110 were offered a voucher by May 2003 and formed the intervention group for this study. The comparison group included applicants assigned to lottery numbers 35,001 to 82,607, who were informed that they would not receive a housing voucher through CHAC within three years of application. The analysis excluded applicants who were on the active waiting list but were not offered a voucher through CHAC (those assigned to lottery numbers 18,111 to 35,000), as well as applicants who were older than 65, had a self-reported disability, or were living in public housing at the time of the application.

Study timing formatted

Eligible households applied in July 1997 and were offered vouchers from August 1997 to August 1998; the wait list was interrupted by a lawsuit, but voucher offers resumed in early 2000 and continued through May 2003. Outcomes were examined through the end of 2005.

Study funding formatted

The National Consortium on Violence Research, the Northwestern University/University of Chicago Joint Center for Poverty Research, Smith Richardson Foundation, and the William T. Grant Foundation

Sample Characteristics

The study sample included heads of households who applied for housing vouchers in Chicago, were younger than 65, did not have a self-reported disability, and were not living in public housing at the time of application. The average annual household income was around $14,000 (2007 dollars), and about 41 percent of applicants received Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) benefits at baseline. On average, sample members were 32 years old. The majority (94 percent) were Black, and 88 percent were female. About 9 percent were married, and more than half (57 percent) were employed at baseline. The racial and ethnic categories sum to more than 100 percent because the authors reported race and ethnicity separately; that is, they reported the percent of the sample who were Hispanic or Latino of any race, as well as the percent of the sample who were Black or White.

Implementing organization formatted

Chicago Housing Authority Corporation (CHAC)

Program history

Housing vouchers had been offered before the program, but the wait list was opened in July 1997 after 12 years of being closed.

Treatment condition formatted

Participants were offered a Section 8 housing voucher through CHAC, which they could use to subsidize rent for housing leased in the private market. The voucher value was equal to the difference between either the fair market rent amount or the selected unit's rent (whichever was lower) and 30 percent of the family's adjusted income (income included earnings and TANF benefits but excluded certain other income). The average fair market rent was $12,000 per year, and the average maximum subsidy based on income and fair market rent was $8,265 per year (in 2007 dollars).

Comparison condition formatted

Applicants in the comparison group were informed that they would not receive a housing voucher through the CHAC program within three years of application. Families could receive housing vouchers from other sources—for example, if they were eligible based on disability status, ethnicity, or risk of housing issues leading to parent–child separation.

Mandatory services formatted

None

Timing of study formatted

Participants could use their housing vouchers indefinitely unless their annual incomes exceeded around $43,000 (in 2007 dollars), at which point the subsidy began phasing out; that is, they received smaller subsidies as their incomes increased.

Program funding formatted

U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development

Setting details formatted

The program took place in Chicago, IL.

Delivered by public or private entity?
Public
Secondary domains examined

Residential stability; neighborhood environment

Earliest publication year
2012
Most recent publication year
2012
Manuscripts
Check edits flag
No
Primary Service
Supportive services (housing)
Enrollment Period
July 1997
Intervention Duration
0.00