Submitted by user on
Study Name
Building Wealth and Health—Full Intervention versus Partial Intervention
Study Sharepoint ID
28557.03
Evaluation name
Evaluation of Building Wealth and Health Network
Strength of Evidence Tag
Reason for the Rating

This study received a low study quality rating because it is a high-attrition randomized controlled trial that does not adjust estimated impacts for potentially important differences between the intervention and comparison groups.

This study received a low study quality rating because it is a high-attrition randomized controlled trial that does not adjust estimated impacts for potentially important differences between the intervention and comparison groups.

Populations targeted
Settings in which the intervention was studied

Subgroups

Subgroup data - Female
No
Subgroup data - Male
No
Subgroup data - White
No
Subgroup data - Black
No
Count age
67
Count Young Adults
0
Count Hard-to-employ
0
Count Disability
0
Count chronically ill
0
Count mentally ill
0
Count substance dependent
0
Count formerly incarcerated
0
Count Justice involved
0
Count limited work history
0
Count homeless
0
Count immigrants
0
Count refugees
0
Count veterans
0
Count female
5
Count Male
0
Count Any postsecondary education
0
Count With a high school diploma or GED
0
Count No high school diploma or GED
24
Count Married
0
Count Parents
0
Count Single Parents
0
Count Non-Custodial Parents
0
Count Employed
61
Count Self employed
0
Count Unemployed
0
Count Disconnected/discouraged workers
0
Count general low-income population
0
Count Very low income (as classified by the authors)
0
Count welfare population
0
Count long-term welfare recipients
0
Count Asian
66
Count Black or African American
2
Count Hispanic or Latino of any race
0
Count American Indian or Alaska Native
0
Count Pacific islander
0
Count White
2
Count White not Hispanic
0
Count More than one race
0
Count Unknown race
1
Count another race
2
Percent female
93.00
Percent Male
7.00
Percent With a high school diploma or GED
33.00
Percent Married
1.00
Percent Parents
100.00
Percent Employed
15.00
Percent Unemployed
85.00
Percent welfare population
100.00
Percent Black or African American
92.00
Percent Hispanic or Latino of any race
3.00
Percent White not Hispanic
3.00
Percent unknown race
3.00
Group formation formatted

This study is a randomized controlled trial. Participants were screened by County Assistant Office staff and referred to research staff. Research staff determined eligibility and received consent from participants. Eligible individuals were those who were receiving Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF), had a 20 hour per week work requirement to receive benefits, and were the primary caregiver of one or more children younger than age 6. After consenting to participate, participants were randomly assigned to one of two intervention conditions (partial or full) or the comparison condition. Recruitment and enrollment took place in June and July 2014. Participants completed baseline surveys and additional follow-up surveys every 3 months over a 15-month period. The research team administered surveys using Audio Computer-Assisted Self-Interview software. The baseline survey took 60 minutes to complete, and follow-up surveys took 30 minutes. The research team compensated participants with $25 for each completed survey.

Study timing formatted

The intervention was studied over a 15-month period between June 2014 and October 2015.

Implementing organization formatted

Drexel University

Treatment condition formatted

The Building Health and Wealth Network served TANF recipients who were caregivers to at least one child younger than age 6. Intervention group members were offered financial empowerment education, matched savings accounts, and trauma-informed peer support. Financial empowerment education involved 28 weekly three-hour classes focused on promoting self-sufficiency. Topics covered in the classes included saving for education, housing, entrepreneurial activities, retirement, improving credit, and reducing debt. The Network provided financial support by helping participants open a credit union savings account and then matching any contributions made by the participants during the program. The Network facilitated weekly peer support groups based on the Sanctuary Model. This model used a trauma-informed approach to help guide participants toward a more stable foundation. The curriculum focused on helping participants manage emotions, process loss, and develop goals in a safe and supportive space.

Comparison condition formatted

The financial empowerment education and matched savings accounts services were identical to the intervention condition. The difference between the conditions was the comparison group did not have access to trauma-informed peer support.

Mandatory services formatted

None

Setting details formatted

The study took place at three County Assistance Offices in South and in Southwest Philadelphia, PA.

Delivered by public or private entity?
Private
Secondary domains examined

Family behavioral health; Economic hardship

Earliest publication year
2016
Most recent publication year
2018
Manuscripts
Check edits flag
No
Primary Service
Substance use disorder treatment and mental health services
Subgroup data - Hispanic
No