Submitted by user on
Study Name
Paycheck Plus—New York City
Study Sharepoint ID
24977.01
Evaluation name
Paycheck Plus Demonstration
Intervention (standard name)
Strength of Evidence Tag
Reason for the Rating

This study received a high study quality rating because it is a low-attrition randomized controlled trial with no known issues that suggest the findings cannot be attributed to the intervention.

This study received a high study quality rating because it is a low-attrition randomized controlled trial with no known issues that suggest the findings cannot be attributed to the intervention.

Settings in which the intervention was studied
Characteristics

Subgroups

Subgroup data - Female
Yes
Subgroup data - Male
Yes
Subgroup data - White
No
Subgroup data - Black
No
Count age
0
Count Young Adults
0
Count Hard-to-employ
0
Count Disability
0
Count chronically ill
0
Count mentally ill
0
Count substance dependent
0
Count formerly incarcerated
0
Count Justice involved
0
Count limited work history
0
Count homeless
0
Count immigrants
0
Count refugees
0
Count veterans
0
Count female
0
Count Male
0
Count Any postsecondary education
0
Count With a high school diploma or GED
0
Count No high school diploma or GED
0
Count Married
0
Count Parents
0
Count Single Parents
0
Count Non-Custodial Parents
0
Count Employed
0
Count Self employed
0
Count Unemployed
0
Count Disconnected/discouraged workers
0
Count general low-income population
0
Count Very low income (as classified by the authors)
0
Count welfare population
0
Count long-term welfare recipients
0
Count Asian
0
Count Black or African American
0
Count Hispanic or Latino of any race
0
Count American Indian or Alaska Native
0
Count Pacific islander
0
Count White
0
Count More than one race
0
Count Unknown race
0
Percent fomerly incarcerated
18.10
Percent female
41.00
Percent Male
59.00
Percent Any postsecondary education
24.20
Percent No high school diploma or GED
21.80
Percent With a high school diploma or GED
78.20
Percent Married
0.00
Percent Non-Custodial Parents
8.60
Percent Employed
45.20
Percent general low-income population
100.00
Percent Black or African American
57.80
Percent Hispanic or Latino of any race
30.00
Percent another race
12.20
Mean age
37.00
Group formation formatted

To be eligible for the study, participants had to (1) be unmarried, (2) have a valid Social Security number, (3) not plan to claim a dependent child on their taxes, (4) be between 21 and 64 years old, (5) have earned less than $30,000 in the prior year, and (6) not receive or be applying to receive Supplemental Security Income or Social Security Disability Insurance. Between September 2013 and February 2014, more than 6,000 eligible participants were recruited and randomly assigned to a group that received Paycheck Plus or to a comparison group that was not eligible for Paycheck Plus but was eligible to receive other existing tax credits. The study restricts its attention to the 5,968 individuals randomly assigned between September 27, 2013, and February 18, 2014. The study team attempted to survey about 80 percent of these individuals (selected by random sampling) 32 months after assignment. In addition, among individuals assigned to the intervention group who also earned less than $10,000 per year, half were randomly assigned to an employment referral group that received additional information about, and referrals to, local employment services. Another review examines the contrast between these two groups.

Study timing formatted

2014 to 2016

Study funding formatted

The demonstration was funded by the New York City Mayor's Office for Economic Opportunity (NYC Opportunity), the Robin Hood Foundation, the Laura and John Arnold Foundation, the Edna McConnell Clark Foundation, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Office of Child Support and Enforcement, and the Chan Zuckerberg Initiative.

Sample Characteristics

All study participants were unmarried and had earned less than $30,000 in the year before study enrollment. On average, participants were about 37 years old at the time of random assignment, and all were ages 21 to 64. More than half of participants (59 percent) were male. The majority were Black (58 percent), 30 percent were Hispanic, and 12 percent were White. About one-quarter (22 percent) did not have a high school degree or a diploma. Nearly half of participants (45 percent) were employed at the time of random assignment, and about 18 percent had been formerly incarcerated.

Implementing organization formatted

MDRC and the Food Bank for New York City.

Program history

The Paycheck Plus program began with this evaluation.

Treatment condition formatted

The individuals assigned to the intervention group were eligible to receive up to $2,000 in income-based tax credits (including the federal earned-income tax credit [EITC] and Paycheck Plus credit). Individuals earning less than $29,900 were eligible for at least some credit. The credit was paid based on earnings reported in 2014, 2015, and 2016, at tax time during the subsequent year (that is, in 2015, 2016, and 2017). In addition, a random subsample of individuals who had earned less than $10,000 in the year before random assignment were offered information about, and referrals to, employment services in their area.

Comparison condition formatted

The comparison group was not offered Paycheck Plus but could continue to receive the EITC if eligible. As all individuals in the study were single adults at enrollment, the maximum federal EITC an individual could qualify for was $510, with individuals earning $15,010 or less receiving some EITC.

Mandatory services formatted

None.

Timing of study formatted

Participants were eligible to receive Paycheck Plus bonuses for up to three years.

Program funding formatted

NYC Opportunity, the Robin Hood Foundation, the Laura and John Arnold Foundation, the Edna McConnell Clark Foundation, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Office of Child Support and Enforcement, and the Chan Zuckerberg Initiative.

Setting details formatted

The study was conducted in New York City.

Delivered by public or private entity?
Private
Secondary domains examined

Tax filing, Criminal justice, Poverty, Material hardship, Health, Child support, Family formation, Banking, Savings

Earliest publication year
2014
Most recent publication year
2018
Check edits flag
Yes
Editor comments

Please check all missing information in manuscripts/citations and replace placeholder words.

Primary Service
Financial incentives
Enrollment Period
September 2013 to February 2014
Intervention Duration
36.00
Subgroup data - Hispanic
No