Submitted by user on
Study Name
Employing and Moving People Off Welfare and Encouraging Responsibility (EMPOWER)—Navajo Reservation
Study Sharepoint ID
3350.03
Evaluation name
Evaluation of the Arizona EMPOWER Welfare Reform Demonstration
Strength of Evidence Tag
Reason for the Rating

This study received a high study quality rating because it is a low-attrition randomized controlled trial with no known issues that suggest the findings cannot be attributed to the intervention.

This study received a high study quality rating because it is a low-attrition randomized controlled trial with no known issues that suggest the findings cannot be attributed to the intervention.

Populations targeted
Settings in which the intervention was studied
Characteristics

Subgroups

Subgroup data - Female
No
Subgroup data - Male
No
Subgroup data - White
No
Subgroup data - Black
No
Count age
0
Count Young Adults
0
Count Hard-to-employ
0
Count Disability
0
Count chronically ill
0
Count mentally ill
0
Count substance dependent
0
Count formerly incarcerated
0
Count Justice involved
0
Count limited work history
0
Count homeless
0
Count immigrants
0
Count refugees
0
Count veterans
0
Count female
0
Count Male
0
Count Any postsecondary education
0
Count With a high school diploma or GED
0
Count No high school diploma or GED
0
Count Married
0
Count Parents
0
Count Single Parents
0
Count Non-Custodial Parents
0
Count Employed
0
Count Self employed
0
Count Unemployed
0
Count Disconnected/discouraged workers
0
Count general low-income population
0
Count Very low income (as classified by the authors)
0
Count welfare population
0
Count long-term welfare recipients
0
Count Asian
0
Count Black or African American
0
Count Hispanic or Latino of any race
0
Count American Indian or Alaska Native
0
Count Pacific islander
0
Count White
0
Count More than one race
0
Count Unknown race
0
Percent female
97.00
Percent Male
3.00
Percent Parents
99.00
Percent welfare population
100.00
Percent American Indian or Alaska Native
100.00
Group formation formatted

A total of 2,934 cases were randomly assigned among four research sites (2,538 cases in the three Phoenix sites and 396 cases in the Navajo reservation site). Random assignment first included all individuals eligible to receive cash assistance or Transitional Medical Assistance in October 1995. Twenty-five percent of identified individuals were assigned to the intervention group, 25 percent to the comparison group, and 50 percent to a nonstudy group. Individuals who were newly approved for cash assistance were randomly assigned using the same procedures in each month from November 1995 to July 1997. This review reports on the 396 cases enrolling in the study at the Navajo reservation site who were randomly assigned to intervention or comparison groups. Most analyses were restricted to the sample of individuals who received cash assistance at random assignment. Other reviews examine results for the Phoenix site.

Study timing formatted

Random assignment occurred from October 1995 to July 1997. Follow-up data was collected for three years.

Study funding formatted

This evaluation was contracted by Arizona's Department of Economic Security.

Sample Characteristics

The study included AFDC, TANF and Transitional Medical Assistance (extended benefits available to individuals transitioning off of AFDC/TANF) cases. These cases were groups of individuals, such as families, who were jointly eligible for these benefits. Within the intervention group at baseline, 23 percent of cases had no adult associated with them, 64 percent of cases had one adult, and 13 percent of cases had two or more adults. More than 99 percent of cases had an associated child, and more than 40 percent of cases had three or more children. Almost all (97 percent) case heads were female, and all were American Indian. Most case heads were ages 30 to 49 (59 percent) or 20 to 29 (33 percent), with 5 percent ages 19 or younger and 4 percent ages 50 or older. Half of all case heads had received cash assistance for each of the previous 24 months.

Implementing organization formatted

State Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC) and Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF)

Program history

Arizona piloted this program for nine months before the evaluation began.

Treatment condition formatted

The EMPOWER program included both increased requirements for receipt of cash assistance and increased assistance. EMPOWER required that single parents younger than 18 live with a responsible adult to receive cash assistance and that parents ages 13 to 15 participate in the Job Opportunities and Basic Skills (JOBS) program to receive cash assistance. (Teen parents ages 16 to 19 were already required to participate in JOBS.) The program also strengthened sanctions for not complying with JOBS requirements and eliminated a rule that made two-parent families ineligible for cash assistance when the primary wage earner worked more than 100 hours per month. EMPOWER families could also receive medical and child care assistance for an additional year after becoming ineligible for cash assistance because of employment and were eligible to receive an individual development account (if they received both cash assistance and food stamps), in which they could deposit money for training or education that would be disregarded in calculating benefits.

Comparison condition formatted

Clients assigned to the comparison group received services as usual under typical requirements for receiving cash assistance.

Mandatory services formatted

Participation was required, and a family’s benefits were automatically sanctioned for a minimum of one month for the first occurrence of noncompliance.

Timing of study formatted

Individuals were exempt from any program time limits.

Program funding formatted

Arizona Department of Economic Security (AFDC and TANF agency) using federal Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC) funding.

Setting details formatted

An AFDC/TANF office located within a Navajo reservation in northeast Arizona.

Delivered by public or private entity?
Public
Secondary domains examined

Family structure, Housing

Earliest publication year
1999
Most recent publication year
2001
Manuscripts
Check edits flag
No
Primary Service
Sanctions
Enrollment Period
October 1995 to July 1997
Intervention Duration
24.00
Subgroup data - Hispanic
No