Submitted by user on
Study Name
CareerAdvance
Study Sharepoint ID
19351
Evaluation name
Effects of a Two-Generation Human Capital Program on Low-Income Parents’ Education, Employment, and Psychological Well-Being
Intervention (standard name)
Strength of Evidence Tag
Reason for the Rating

This study received a low study quality rating because it is a quasi-experimental design that does not demonstrate that the intervention and comparison groups were sufficiently similar before the intervention.

This study received a low study quality rating because it is a quasi-experimental design that does not demonstrate that the intervention and comparison groups were sufficiently similar before the intervention.

Populations targeted
Settings in which the intervention was studied
Count age
0
Count Young Adults
0
Count Hard-to-employ
0
Count Disability
0
Count chronically ill
0
Count mentally ill
0
Count substance dependent
0
Count formerly incarcerated
0
Count Justice involved
0
Count limited work history
0
Count homeless
0
Count immigrants
0
Count refugees
0
Count veterans
0
Count female
0
Count Male
0
Count Any postsecondary education
0
Count With a high school diploma or GED
0
Count No high school diploma or GED
0
Count Married
0
Count Parents
0
Count Single Parents
0
Count Non-Custodial Parents
0
Count Employed
0
Count Self employed
0
Count Unemployed
0
Count Disconnected/discouraged workers
0
Count general low-income population
0
Count Very low income (as classified by the authors)
0
Count welfare population
0
Count long-term welfare recipients
0
Count Asian
0
Count Black or African American
0
Count Hispanic or Latino of any race
0
Count American Indian or Alaska Native
0
Count Pacific islander
0
Count White
0
Count More than one race
0
Count Unknown race
0
Count another race
0
Percent female
98.00
Percent Male
2.00
Percent Any postsecondary education
49.00
Percent No high school diploma or GED
7.00
Percent With a high school diploma or GED
93.00
Percent Parents
100.00
Percent Single Parents
32.00
Percent Black or African American
40.00
Percent Hispanic or Latino of any race
9.00
Percent White
28.00
Percent unknown race
23.00
Mean age
29.00
Group formation formatted

All parents with children enrolled in the Community Action Project of Tulsa County (CAP Tulsa) Head Start programs were invited to apply for CareerAdvance. A total of 317 parents applied to participate, of which 221 were accepted, and 162 of those who were accepted enrolled in the program in the 2011 to 2014 cohorts. Eligibility was based on having a child enrolled in CAP Tulsa Head Start, as well as an interview, background check, drug test, current health, English language proficiency, and ability to enroll in courses at the local community college. The study team identified 176 parents for the comparison group that had children enrolled in CAP Tulsa Head Start and were similar to parents in the intervention group based on a large number of characteristics, including neighborhood, race, gender, age, education, relationship to the child enrolled in Head Start, single-parent status, foster-parent status, and household income.

Study timing formatted

Individuals enrolled in CareerAdvance between 2011 and 2014. They were followed for about one year after they began the program.

Study funding formatted

Funding was provided by the Administration of Children and Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (Grants 90FX00100 and 90PH0020); the W.K. Kellogg Foundation (Grant P3020014); and the Foundation for Child Development (Grant Northwestern 06-2014).

Sample Characteristics

Participants in the study were parents with children enrolled in the CAP Head Start program. Most of the sample consisted of mothers in their late 20s or early 30s. Almost all (98 percent) sample members were female, and about one-third (32 percent) were single parents. The average age was 29. About 40 percent of participants were Black, 28 percent were White, 9 percent were Hispanic, and 23 percent were of another racial or ethnic background. Seven percent of participants had less than a high school degree, while the majority of participants either had a high school degree or equivalent certificate (44 percent) or another certificate or associate's degree (44 percent). Average annual household income at baseline was $15,190.

Implementing organization formatted

CAP Tulsa provided all services.

Program history

CareerAdvance was established in 2008.

Treatment condition formatted

Participants in the intervention group were parents with children enrolled in the CAP Tulsa Head Start program, who applied, were accepted, and ultimately enrolled in the CareerAdvance training program. CareerAdvance is a two-generation program combining a sectoral career pathways training and certification program for parents with high quality early education benefits (provided through Head Start) for children. Intervention participants enrolled in one of three programs linked to a health care career track (nursing, health information technology, or medical assisting). Each track consisted of a sequence of education and training activities, along with opportunities to attain sectoral certifications. Participants also received funding for tuition, books, and supplies; additional child care assistance (if child care was needed outside CAP Tulsa Head Start hours); financial incentives for meeting program milestones; and coaching. They could also attend peer support groups.

Comparison condition formatted

Individuals in the comparison condition had children enrolled in the CAP Head Start program but did not receive additional services from CareerAdvance.

Mandatory services formatted

None

Timing of study formatted

CareerAdvance training modules are stackable, meaning that participants can exit either permanently or temporarily at multiple points in the program with a credential. Sixty-four percent of participants were still enrolled in CareerAdvance at one year after enrollment. For participants who left the program before the one-year mark, the average tenure in the program was 250 days.

Program funding formatted

The study did not describe program funding sources.

Setting details formatted

This study took place in Tulsa, OK.

Delivered by public or private entity?
Private
Secondary domains examined

Psychological well-being; material hardship

Earliest publication year
2019
Most recent publication year
2019
Manuscripts
Check edits flag
No
Primary Service
Occupational or sectoral training
Enrollment Period
2011 to 2014
Intervention Duration
12.00