Submitted by user on
Study Name
Standard Job Club versus Fast Track Job Club
Study Sharepoint ID
90002
Evaluation name
The Job Search Assistance Strategies Evaluation
Strength of Evidence Tag
Reason for the Rating

This study received a high study quality rating because it is a low-attrition randomized controlled trial with no known issues that suggest the findings cannot be attributed to the intervention.

This study received a high study quality rating because it is a low-attrition randomized controlled trial with no known issues that suggest the findings cannot be attributed to the intervention.

Populations targeted
Settings in which the intervention was studied
Count age
0
Count Young Adults
0
Count Hard-to-employ
0
Count Disability
0
Count chronically ill
0
Count mentally ill
0
Count substance dependent
0
Count formerly incarcerated
0
Count Justice involved
0
Count limited work history
0
Count homeless
0
Count immigrants
0
Count refugees
0
Count veterans
0
Count female
342
Count Male
150
Count Any postsecondary education
205
Count With a high school diploma or GED
168
Count No high school diploma or GED
119
Count Married
0
Count Parents
0
Count Single Parents
0
Count Non-Custodial Parents
0
Count Employed
0
Count Self employed
0
Count Unemployed
0
Count Disconnected/discouraged workers
0
Count general low-income population
493
Count Very low income (as classified by the authors)
0
Count welfare population
0
Count long-term welfare recipients
323
Count Asian
0
Count Black or African American
174
Count Hispanic or Latino of any race
75
Count American Indian or Alaska Native
0
Count Pacific islander
0
Count White
167
Count More than one race
0
Count unknown or not reported
75
Count another race
0
Percent female
69.50
Percent Male
30.50
Percent Any postsecondary education
41.60
Percent No high school diploma or GED
24.20
Percent With a high school diploma or GED
75.80
Percent welfare population
100.00
Percent long-term welfare recipients
65.60
Percent Black or African American
35.40
Percent Hispanic or Latino of any race
15.40
Percent White not Hispanic
33.90
Percent Unknown or not reported
15.30
Group formation formatted

This study is a randomized controlled trial. To qualify for study enrollment, individuals had to (1) be enrolled in the California Work Opportunity and Responsibility to Kids (CalWORKs) cash assistance program, (2) not previously have completed a Sacramento County Department of Human Assistance (DHA) job club, (3) have been deemed a suitable candidate by program staff, and (4) consent to study participation. Random assignment took place from 2016 to 2018, with 493 participants randomly assigned to either the intervention condition (Standard Job Club) or the comparison condition (Fast Track Job Club).

Study timing formatted

Study participants were randomly assigned between April 2016 and July 2017. The study followed participants for three quarters after they completed the eight-week program.

Study funding formatted

Office of Planning, Research, and Evaluation, within ACF at the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

Sample Characteristics

All participants received public welfare benefits via CalWORKs. Most (70 percent) participants identified as female, 35 percent of participants identified as Black, 34 percent identified as White, and 15 percent identified as Hispanic (15 percent of participants did not disclose their race). About one-quarter (24 percent) of participants lacked a high-school diploma or equivalent certificate, whereas about 42 percent had at least some college education. Average earnings in the year before random assignment were around $6,800.

Implementing organization formatted

Sacramento County Department of Human Assistance (DHA)

Program history

Both the Standard Job Club and Fast Track Job Club began operations in 2016. Sacramento County's DHA developed and operated both programs.

Treatment condition formatted

Intervention group members enrolled in a Standard Job Club. This consisted of an eight-week program broken into three-week and five-week segments. The first segment required that enrollees attend one week of daily eight-hour group classes on workplace behavior skills and two weeks of daily eight-hour group classes on job-search skills. The second segment required that enrollees complete five weeks of supervised job search. During this time, enrollees had to make daily trips to the Standard Job Club office, where they receive individual assistance from program staff.

Comparison condition formatted

Comparison group members enrolled in a Fast Track Job Club. The eight-week program was broken into three-and-one-half-day and seven-week segments. The first segment required that enrollees attend three days of eight-hour daily group classes on job-search skills and one half day of individual meetings and activities with Fast Track Job Club staff. The second segment required that enrollees complete seven weeks of independent job search. During this time, enrollees had to make weekly trips to the Fast Track Job Club office to meet with program staff. Noncompliance with the program could lead to enrollees losing part of their cash assistance.

Mandatory services formatted

Noncompliance with the program could lead to enrollees losing part of their CalWORKS cash assistance benefit.

Timing of study formatted

Both the Standard Job Club and Fast Track Job Club were eight-week programs.

Program funding formatted

CalWorks (California Temporary Assistance for Needy Families)

Setting details formatted

This study took place in Sacramento, CA. Services were provided at eight Sacramento County DHA offices.

Delivered by public or private entity?
Public
Secondary domains examined

Job quality

Earliest publication year
2019
Most recent publication year
2020
Manuscripts
Check edits flag
No
Primary Service
Work readiness acitvities
Enrollment Period
April 2016 to September 2017
Intervention Duration
2.00