- Log in to post comments
Subgroups
This study used a randomized controlled trial design. Recruitment primarily took place at shelters or on the street. Inclusion criteria required participants to be age 18 or older (19 or older in British Columbia), hold legal status in Canada (as a citizen, immigrant, refugee, or claimant), have a serious mental disorder, and be experiencing absolute homelessness or precarious housing (with at least two instances of absolute homelessness) in the year before randomization. People were screened for eligibility and assessed as high or moderate need before being randomly assigned into intervention and comparison groups. Researchers used a computer program to assign 950 high-need participants to receive immediate housing placement with ACT or treatment as usual (the comparison group). In total, evaluators collected data for 439 participants in the intervention group and 417 participants in the comparison group. Both the unit of assignment and unit of analysis were at the individual level.
24 months
Mental Health Commission of Canada
Intervention group members were placed immediately into housing and received rent subsidies up to $600 per month, and participants contributed no more than 30 percent of their income toward housing. Participants also received support from multidisciplinary ACT teams, which included a psychiatrist, nurse, and peer specialist, among others. Participants met with a member of the ACT team at least once per week, and the team provided round-the-clock crisis coverage. All intervention group members were people experiencing homelessness who had a mental illness and had been assessed as having high needs.
The comparison group received treatment as usual, defined as access to existing housing or intervention programs in their communities. All comparison group members were people experiencing homelessness who had a mental illness and had been assessed as having high needs.
None
At Home/Chez Soi was implemented in five sites across Canada: Toronto, Moncton, Montreal, Winnipeg, and Vancouver. Each site operated in a unique local context, including varied housing and service availability contexts.
Quality of life measures; health outcomes; housing stability and quality