Submitted by user on
Study Name
Michigan Goals Progress Success (MI-GPS)
Study Sharepoint ID
27859
Evaluation name
Job Search Assistance (JSA) Evaluation
Intervention (standard name)
Strength of Evidence Tag
Reason for the Rating

This study received a high study quality rating because it is a low-attrition randomized controlled trial with no known issues that suggest the findings cannot be attributed to the intervention.

This study received a high study quality rating because it is a low-attrition randomized controlled trial with no known issues that suggest the findings cannot be attributed to the intervention.

Populations targeted
Settings in which the intervention was studied

Subgroups

Subgroup data - Female
No
Subgroup data - Male
No
Subgroup data - White
No
Subgroup data - Black
No
Count age
0
Count Young Adults
0
Count Hard-to-employ
0
Count Disability
0
Count chronically ill
0
Count mentally ill
0
Count substance dependent
0
Count formerly incarcerated
0
Count Justice involved
0
Count limited work history
0
Count homeless
0
Count immigrants
0
Count refugees
0
Count veterans
0
Count female
0
Count Male
0
Count Any postsecondary education
0
Count With a high school diploma or GED
0
Count No high school diploma or GED
0
Count Married
0
Count Parents
0
Count Single Parents
0
Count Non-Custodial Parents
0
Count Employed
0
Count Self employed
0
Count Unemployed
0
Count Disconnected/discouraged workers
0
Count general low-income population
0
Count Very low income (as classified by the authors)
0
Count welfare population
0
Count long-term welfare recipients
0
Count Asian
0
Count Black or African American
0
Count Hispanic or Latino of any race
0
Count American Indian or Alaska Native
0
Count Pacific islander
0
Count White
0
Count White not Hispanic
0
Count More than one race
0
Count Unknown race
0
Count another race
0
Percent female
91.70
Percent Male
8.30
Percent Any postsecondary education
36.00
Percent No high school diploma or GED
27.80
Percent With a high school diploma or GED
72.20
Percent Married
7.40
Percent Employed
12.70
Percent welfare population
100.00
Percent Black or African American
60.30
Percent Hispanic or Latino of any race
3.90
Percent White not Hispanic
32.60
Percent another race
3.20
Mean age
27.70
Group formation formatted

Study participants were recruited through the Family Independence Program, Michigan's state Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) program. Five local offices agreed to participate in the evaluation. Staff at these offices recruited applicants and returning recipients who were eligible for cash assistance and who were subject to mandatory work requirements. Staff offered these people the opportunity to participate in the study when they arrived for orientation. Staff randomly assigned people who agreed to participate in the study and had not previously been randomly assigned. The study randomly assigned 2,081 people to the MI-GPS group (1,037) or a comparison group (1,044) from October 2016 to August 2017. After random assignment, participants attended the orientation for the group to which they were randomly assigned (MI-GPS or services as usual). Assignment and analysis occurred at the individual level.

Study timing formatted

The pilot project randomly assigned people from October 2016 to August 2017, and examined information on outcomes for up to 15 months following random assignment.

Study funding formatted

This research was funded by ACF, Office of Planning, Research, and Evaluation at the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

Sample Characteristics

A majority (92 percent) of participants were female. Sixty percent of participants were Black or African American, and 33 percent were White. The average age was 28. Almost all sample members (90 percent) had children in their household. All sample members received or were eligible and had applied for TANF; about half (55 percent) had never received TANF before applying, and one-quarter (22 percent) had received TANF for less than one year before applying.

Implementing organization formatted

Five local workforce agencies oversaw implementation. The program was operated jointly by the Michigan state TANF agency, which provided cash assistance, and the Michigan state workforce agency, which provided employment services.

Program history

MI-GPS is a pilot that did not exist before the start of the study.

Treatment condition formatted

People assigned to the intervention condition received a goal-oriented coaching approach called MI-GPS. Major components of MI-GPS included a redesigned program orientation focused on collaborative work between participants and staff. This orientation helped participants set employment-related goals and achieve their goals. In addition, all participants were assigned to a coach. Coaches worked with participants to set goals and support participants' progress. Coaching focused on identifying and achieving small activities to move toward goals, and letting participants have ownership of their goal-setting process and activities. Finally, MI-GPS offered flexible work activities outside of those mandated by federal TANF work participation requirements.

Comparison condition formatted

People assigned to the comparison condition received standard state TANF services, which started with a standard orientation focused on program rules and compliance and a three-week Application Eligibility Period (AEP) focused on identifying and addressing barriers to employment. Applicants who completed the AEP began receiving cash assistance and participating in the Partnership, Accountability, Training, Hope (PATH) program, which included assigned work activities. Throughout AEP/PATH, people worked with a career development facilitator who assigned and tracked participation in work activities and worked with the participant to identify and address barriers to work.

Mandatory services formatted

People were required to participate to continue receiving public benefits.

Timing of study formatted

MI-GPS did not specify a duration. People were required to participate to continue receiving TANF cash assistance, which is subject to a 48-month lifetime limit in Michigan. Coaches typically encouraged people to develop incremental goals that they could accomplish in three to six months. For many participants, program duration was relatively short. Only about one two-thirds of applicants were still engaged after three weeks, and about three-quarters of applicants were not receiving cash assistance nine months after random assignment.

Program funding formatted

Michigan TANF

Setting details formatted

The study took place at five local workforce agencies in Genesee and Wayne Counties, MI.

Delivered by public or private entity?
Public
Secondary domains examined

Grit, self-efficacy, perception of job search skills, motivation to work, barriers to work, and job characteristics

Earliest publication year
2020
Most recent publication year
2020
Manuscripts
Check edits flag
No
Primary Service
Employment coaching
Enrollment Period
October 2016 to August 2017
Intervention Duration
0.00
Subgroup data - Hispanic
No