Submitted by user on
Study Name
Integrated Basic Education and Skills Training (I-BEST)
Study Sharepoint ID
24989.05
Evaluation name
Pathways for Advancing Careers and Education (PACE) 

Subgroups

Subgroup data - Female
No
Subgroup data - Male
No
Subgroup data - White
No
Subgroup data - Black
No
Count age
0
Count Young Adults
0
Count Hard-to-employ
0
Count Disability
0
Count chronically ill
0
Count mentally ill
0
Count substance dependent
0
Count formerly incarcerated
0
Count Justice involved
0
Count limited work history
0
Count homeless
0
Count immigrants
0
Count refugees
0
Count veterans
0
Count female
0
Count Male
0
Count Any postsecondary education
0
Count With a high school diploma or GED
0
Count No high school diploma or GED
0
Count Married
0
Count Parents
0
Count Single Parents
0
Count Non-Custodial Parents
0
Count Employed
0
Count Self employed
0
Count Unemployed
0
Count Disconnected/discouraged workers
0
Count general low-income population
0
Count Very low income (as classified by the authors)
0
Count welfare population
0
Count long-term welfare recipients
0
Count Asian
0
Count Black or African American
0
Count Hispanic or Latino of any race
0
Count American Indian or Alaska Native
0
Count Pacific islander
0
Count White
0
Count White not Hispanic
0
Count More than one race
0
Count Unknown race
0
Count another race
0
Percent female
57.50
Percent Male
42.50
Percent Any postsecondary education
29.40
Percent No high school diploma or GED
30.70
Percent With a high school diploma or GED
69.40
Percent Employed
33.40
Percent Unemployed
66.60
Percent general low-income population
100.00
Percent Black or African American
7.60
Percent Hispanic or Latino of any race
26.00
Percent White not Hispanic
54.90
Percent another race
14.10
Group formation formatted

Each of the three colleges implementing I-BEST recruited students with low levels of basic skills attainment for the study and program. Interested applicants first took the Comprehensive Adult Student Assessment System math and reading assessments to determine eligibility for I-BEST. The scores required on the assessments for eligibility for the program varied slightly across the three colleges but generally reflected reading and math abilities between the elementary and high school levels. Eligible people then met with program staff to enroll in the study. After completing a consent form and baseline surveys, program staff randomly assigned people to the intervention and comparison groups. Random assignment occurred from November 2011 to September 2014, with 315 people assigned to the intervention group and 317 to the comparison group.

Study timing formatted

People were randomly assigned from November 2011 to September 2014, and the study presents findings for Years 1 to 6 after random assignment.

Study funding formatted

The Pathways for Advancing Careers and Education (PACE) evaluation was funded by the Office of Planning, Research, and Evaluation in ACF, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

Sample Characteristics

More than 60 percent of study participants were older than 25, and about 58 percent were female. About half were White, not Hispanic (55 percent), and about one-quarter were Hispanic (26 percent). Most participants had a high school diploma or less education (71 percent total). In the year before random assignment, about 60 percent received benefits from the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children or the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program.

Implementing organization formatted

Three community and technical colleges—Bellingham Technical College, Whatcom Community College, and Everett Community College—implemented the I-BEST program as part of the PACE evaluation.

Program history

The Washington State Board for Community and Technical Colleges (SBCTC) designed I-BEST in the 2004–2005 academic year as a pilot program at 10 community and technical colleges throughout the state. SBCTC expanded the program to all 34 public community and technical colleges in the state in 2005–2006 and 2006–2007.

Treatment condition formatted

I-BEST offered occupational training courses to students with low skills in public community and technical colleges in Washington State. Each college's I-BEST program was a course with a structured career pathway and gave students the ability to gain college credits and credentials toward careers in high demand. I-BEST offered courses in a variety of areas, including the nursing, electrical, and clerical fields. Two courses included internships or clinical experience. Participants in the I-BEST intervention groups at the three colleges in the PACE evaluation could access additional financial supports for tuition and supportive services, as well as a dedicated advisor who provided academic supports and career planning.

Comparison condition formatted

People in the comparison group could access occupational and educational supports through other programs in their communities and could take non-I-BEST courses at the three I-BEST colleges in the PACE evaluation.

Mandatory services formatted

None

Timing of study formatted

Across the three colleges, the length of the I-BEST program varied from one to three quarters.

Program funding formatted

Washington SBCTC and Open Society Foundations

Setting details formatted

The study evaluated the I-BEST program at three colleges in Washington State: Bellingham Technical College, Whatcom Community College, and Everett Community College.

Delivered by public or private entity?
Public
Secondary domains examined

Psychosocial skills, life stressors, and family structure

Earliest publication year
2018
Most recent publication year
2022
Manuscripts
Check edits flag
No
Primary Service
Occupational or sectoral training
Enrollment Period
November 2011 to September 2014
Intervention Duration
0.00
Subgroup data - Hispanic
No
Intervention Cost
$5687
Comparison cost
$62