Submitted by user on
Study Name
Cleveland Employment Retention and Advancement (ERA)
Study Sharepoint ID
3132
Evaluation name
Employment Retention and Advancement (ERA) project
Intervention name from study report
Cleveland Achieve
Strength of Evidence Tag
Reason for the Rating

This study received a high study quality rating because it is a low-attrition randomized controlled trial with no known issues that suggest the findings cannot be attributed to the intervention.

This study received a high study quality rating because it is a low-attrition randomized controlled trial with no known issues that suggest the findings cannot be attributed to the intervention.

Populations targeted
Settings in which the intervention was studied
Characteristics

Subgroups

Subgroup data - Female
No
Subgroup data - Male
No
Subgroup data - White
No
Subgroup data - Black
No
Percent female
81.90
Percent Male
18.10
Percent No high school diploma or GED
26.30
Percent With a high school diploma or GED
73.70
Percent Married
22.20
Percent Parents
60.00
Percent Employed
100.00
Percent Black or African American
56.40
Percent Hispanic or Latino of any race
5.70
Percent White not Hispanic
34.40
Percent another race
3.40
Group formation formatted

The evaluation randomly assigned 44 employers and firms (as opposed to employees); half were assigned to the intervention group, and half were assigned to the comparison group from September 2002 to May 2004. Employers and firms in the nursing sector were targeted because of the high turnover rates in the long-term nursing industry. To be eligible for random assignment, employers and firms needed to have employed at least 15 workers earning less than $13 per hour and hired within the past six months. All 44 employers and firms were retained in the study. The unit of analysis was employees. After the evaluation identified firms (but before random assignment), the authors conducted research information sessions at each employer to invite employees to participate. A total of 697 employees consented to participate and were included in the study. The intervention group included 381 employees from 22 firms and the comparison group included 316 employees and 22 firms. Participants were eligible for the 12-month survey if they were 18 years or older at the time of random assignment, spoke English or Spanish, worked in the health care industry (two manufacturing firms were excluded from the survey), and were still working for their original random assignment employer. All 656 eligible participants were chosen to participate in the survey, and a total of 485 participants completed the survey (260 in the intervention condition and 225 in the comparison condition).

Study timing formatted

Employers were recruited between early 2002 and mid-2004 and were randomly assigned to each condition in waves. Outcome data were collected two years after random assignment.

Study funding formatted

The Office of Planning, Research, and Evaluation in ACF at the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services funded the study, with support from the U.S. Department of Labor.

Sample Characteristics

Employers and firms were small to medium-sized (40 percent had 150 to 200 employees). Most employers and firms had a high turnover rate and offered an Employee Assistance Program; about a quarter of the employers were unionized. Most employees (82 percent) were female; about 56 percent were Black and non-Hispanic; about 73 percent had a high school diploma, GED, or higher; and the average wage was less than $9 per hour.

Implementing organization formatted

Towards Employment

Program history

The Employment Retention and Advancement (ERA) project was launched in 1999 and was expected to end in 2009. The Achieve program was piloted in 2001 with five employers before becoming part of the ERA evaluation.

Treatment condition formatted

The Achieve program was designed to help low-wage employees retain jobs. Run by a community-based social services organization, the program delivered services in the workplace and consisted of three components: case management, weekly life-skills learning sessions, and training for supervisors. Staff met individually with clients to discuss workplace and housing problems as well as transportation and child care concerns. Weekly sessions and workshops addressed topics such as time management, goal setting, budgeting, and credit repair. The program also trained the supervisors of low-wage workers.

Comparison condition formatted

Employers and their workers in the comparison condition did not have access to Achieve services but could have received other employment services available in the community.

Mandatory services formatted

None.

Timing of study formatted

Services were offered to participating employers for one year.

Program funding formatted

Public- and private-sector funding.

Setting details formatted

Services were provided to employees at their workplace in the Cleveland area.

Delivered by public or private entity?
Private
Secondary domains examined

None

Earliest publication year
2008
Most recent publication year
2010
Manuscripts
Check edits flag
No
Editor comments

revised the 'intervention' field to "Employment Retention and Advancement (ERA) - Cleveland"

Primary Service
Employment retention services
Enrollment Period
September 2002 to May 2004
Intervention Duration
12.00
Subgroup data - Hispanic
No