Submitted by user on
Study Name
Enhanced Job Club (EJC)—Two-Parent Families
Study Sharepoint ID
2955.3096.04
Evaluation name
Employment Retention and Advancement (ERA) Project
Intervention (standard name)
Strength of Evidence Tag
Reason for the Rating

This study received a high study quality rating because it is a low-attrition randomized controlled trial with no known issues that suggest the findings cannot be attributed to the intervention.

This study received a high study quality rating because it is a low-attrition randomized controlled trial with no known issues that suggest the findings cannot be attributed to the intervention.

Settings in which the intervention was studied
Count age
0
Count Young Adults
0
Count Hard-to-employ
0
Count Disability
0
Count chronically ill
0
Count mentally ill
0
Count substance dependent
0
Count formerly incarcerated
0
Count Justice involved
0
Count limited work history
0
Count homeless
0
Count immigrants
0
Count refugees
0
Count veterans
0
Count female
0
Count Male
0
Count Any postsecondary education
0
Count With a high school diploma or GED
0
Count No high school diploma or GED
0
Count Married
0
Count Parents
0
Count Single Parents
0
Count Non-Custodial Parents
0
Count Employed
0
Count Self employed
0
Count Unemployed
0
Count Disconnected/discouraged workers
0
Count general low-income population
0
Count Very low income (as classified by the authors)
0
Count welfare population
0
Count long-term welfare recipients
0
Count Asian
0
Count Black or African American
0
Count Hispanic or Latino of any race
0
Count American Indian or Alaska Native
0
Count Pacific islander
0
Count White
0
Count More than one race
0
Count Unknown race
0
Percent female
54.49
Percent Male
45.51
Percent With a high school diploma or GED
62.10
Percent Parents
100.00
Percent Unemployed
100.00
Percent welfare population
100.00
Percent Black or African American
12.40
Percent Hispanic or Latino of any race
31.90
Percent White not Hispanic
50.30
Percent another race
5.30
Mean age
31.20
Group formation formatted

The study focused on individuals who were unemployed, receiving Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF), and participating in California's mandatory welfare-to-work program for this evaluation. Selected individuals were randomly assigned in June 2004 through September 2004 to either the Enhanced Job Club (EJC) or Traditional Job Club (TJC) groups. This study includes 207 research sample members who were in two-parent families. (Another study examines effects for single-parent families.) Only one member of each family is included in the sample. If both parents were eligible for the program, program staff selected one to participate in the study before random assignment, but both could be eligible to receive services.

Study timing formatted

Random assignment occurred in June 2004 through September 2004, and follow-up lasted three years.

Study funding formatted

The Office of Planning, Research, and Evaluation in ACF at the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services funded the study, with support from the U.S. Department of Labor.

Sample Characteristics

The Los Angeles site study sample included 207 unemployed TANF recipients in two-parent families. Across all members of two-parent families enrolled in Employment Retention and Advancement (ERA), half were White and non-Hispanic, 32 percent were Hispanic, and 12 percent were Black and non-Hispanic. On average, participants were 31 years old. More than half (62 percent) had at least a high school diploma or equivalent certification, and more than half (59 percent) were employed during the quarter when they enrolled in ERA. In the year before enrolling in ERA, most participants (76 percent) received the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, and slightly less than half (42 percent) received TANF.

Implementing organization formatted

Los Angeles County Department of Public Social Services (state TANF agency) and Los Angeles County Office of Education

Program history

Development of the EJC model began in 2000. The model was first implemented in 2002.

Treatment condition formatted

The EJC model aimed to increase unemployed TANF clients' employment retention and advancement in fields aligned with their occupational interests. EJC included classroom activities and targeted job search activities, and clients had access to a job developer and a job coach. EJC was provided over the course of five weeks. During the first week, individuals participated in a career planning and job search preparation workshop. During the second week, participants refined plans and discussed their job search. During the third and fourth weeks, individuals who remained unemployed expanded the scope of their job search. During the fifth week, individuals who remained unemployed received individualized job search assistance.

Comparison condition formatted

Individuals in the comparison group received job club services through a TJC model. The TJC model aimed to place unemployed TANF clients rapidly in any job, including jobs not necessarily aligned with clients’ occupational interests. TJC operated over a three-week period and included mostly job search activities.

Mandatory services formatted

Participants were mandated to participate in the assigned job club and could face sanctions for failing to do so. (The fifth week of the EJC condition was voluntary.)

Timing of study formatted

EJC services lasted for five weeks.

Program funding formatted

California TANF

Setting details formatted

The study took place in two regions (San Gabriel Valley and central Los Angeles) of Los Angeles County.

Delivered by public or private entity?
Public
Secondary domains examined

None

Earliest publication year
2010
Most recent publication year
2010
Manuscripts
Check edits flag
No
Primary Service
Work-readiness activities
Enrollment Period
June 2004 to September 2004
Intervention Duration
1.50