Submitted by user on
Study Name
Noncustodial Parent (NCP) Choices PEER Curriculum Enhancement Pilot
Study Sharepoint ID
3361
Strength of Evidence Tag
Reason for the Rating

This study received a high study quality rating because it is a low-attrition randomized controlled trial with no known issues that suggest the findings cannot be attributed to the intervention.

This study received a high study quality rating because it is a low-attrition randomized controlled trial with no known issues that suggest the findings cannot be attributed to the intervention.

Populations targeted
Settings in which the intervention was studied
Count age
330
Count Young Adults
0
Count Hard-to-employ
0
Count Disability
0
Count chronically ill
0
Count mentally ill
0
Count substance dependent
0
Count formerly incarcerated
0
Count Justice involved
0
Count limited work history
0
Count homeless
0
Count immigrants
0
Count refugees
0
Count veterans
0
Count female
0
Count Male
330
Count Any postsecondary education
0
Count With a high school diploma or GED
0
Count No high school diploma or GED
0
Count Married
0
Count Parents
330
Count Single Parents
0
Count Non-Custodial Parents
0
Count Employed
84
Count Self employed
0
Count Unemployed
245
Count Disconnected/discouraged workers
0
Count general low-income population
0
Count Very low income (as classified by the authors)
0
Count welfare population
0
Count long-term welfare recipients
0
Count Asian
0
Count Black or African American
82
Count Hispanic or Latino of any race
225
Count American Indian or Alaska Native
0
Count Pacific islander
330
Count White
0
Count More than one race
0
Count Unknown race
0
Percent Male
100.00
Percent Parents
100.00
Percent Non-Custodial Parents
100.00
Percent Employed
25.46
Percent Unemployed
74.54
Percent Black or African American
24.86
Percent Hispanic or Latino of any race
68.22
Percent unknown race
6.91
Mean age
33.50
Group formation formatted

All individuals had a court order to appear for NCP Choices on a specific day. Evaluators randomly assigned calendar days to be PEER days or comparison group days. Individuals whose court order occurred on a PEER day were assigned to the intervention group, and those whose court order occurred on a comparison day were assigned to the comparison group. The study enrolled 162 people into the intervention group and 168 into the comparison group between June 2010 and January 2011.

Study timing formatted

The authors report outcomes for participants enrolled in the study between June 2010 and January 2011. Impacts were measured about 6 to 13 months after assignment.

Study funding formatted

The Texas Office of the Attorney General funded the study.

Sample Characteristics

All noncustodial parents in the study were male. Their average age was between 33 and 34 years old. About two-thirds of participants were Hispanic (68 percent), and one-quarter were Black. Twenty-five percent were employed at the start of the program. In addition, 53 percent had experienced a decrease in earnings of at least 85 percent within the previous two years.

Implementing organization formatted

Texas Office of the Attorney General Child Support division and local workforce development boards

Program history

The NCP Choices PEER Curriculum Enhancement Pilot is an extension of the NCP Choices program, which began in 2005. This PEER extension began in 2010.

Treatment condition formatted

The NCP Choices PEER curriculum enhancement served unemployed or underemployed noncustodial parents whose children were receiving or had received Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) or Medicaid benefits. NCP Choices seeks to increase child support payments and reduce TANF participation among custodial parents by improving employment and earnings outcomes of noncustodial parents; the PEER curriculum enhancement was designed to support these goals. Individuals participated in a number of workshops covering financial responsibility, parenting and co-parenting skills, and financial education. Workshops included multiple intervention group members, a facilitator, and a peer coach. All individuals also received standard NCP Choices services, which included assessments, case management, job search assistance, support services, and employment retention support.

Comparison condition formatted

Members of the comparison group received standard NCP Choices services but not the PEER curriculum enhancement.

Mandatory services formatted

Participation in PEER was mandated by court orders and people who did not participate nor pay their child support payments could be jailed.

Timing of study formatted

Participants were still receiving services at the time the study was published.

Program funding formatted

Not known

Setting details formatted

The pilot was implemented in Hidalgo County, El Paso, and Beaumont/Port Arthur, TX.

Delivered by public or private entity?
Public
Secondary domains examined

Criminal justice, Parenting and co-parenting

Earliest publication year
2011
Most recent publication year
2011
Manuscripts
Check edits flag
No
Primary Service
Soft skills training
Enrollment Period
June 2010 to January 2011
Intervention Duration
1.00