Submitted by user on
Study Name
Compass Family Self-Sufficiency (FSS) Program—Massachusetts sites
Study Sharepoint ID
25852
Intervention (standard name)
Strength of Evidence Tag
Reason for the Rating

This study received a low study quality rating because it is a quasi-experimental design that does not demonstrate that the intervention and comparison groups were sufficiently similar before the intervention.

This study received a low study quality rating because it is a quasi-experimental design that does not demonstrate that the intervention and comparison groups were sufficiently similar before the intervention.

Settings in which the intervention was studied
Count age
0
Count Young Adults
0
Count Hard-to-employ
0
Count Disability
0
Count chronically ill
0
Count mentally ill
0
Count substance dependent
0
Count formerly incarcerated
0
Count Justice involved
0
Count limited work history
0
Count homeless
0
Count immigrants
0
Count refugees
0
Count veterans
0
Count female
0
Count Male
0
Count Any postsecondary education
0
Count With a high school diploma or GED
0
Count No high school diploma or GED
0
Count Married
0
Count Parents
0
Count Single Parents
0
Count Non-Custodial Parents
0
Count Employed
0
Count Self employed
0
Count Unemployed
0
Count Disconnected/discouraged workers
0
Count general low-income population
0
Count Very low income (as classified by the authors)
0
Count welfare population
0
Count long-term welfare recipients
0
Count Asian
0
Count Black or African American
0
Count Hispanic or Latino of any race
0
Count American Indian or Alaska Native
0
Count Pacific islander
0
Count White
0
Count More than one race
0
Count Unknown race
0
Count another race
0
Percent general low-income population
100.00
Group formation formatted

The intervention group included households receiving Housing Choice Vouchers (HCVs) that enrolled in Compass FSS programs from January 2011 to March 2015 and that had less than one year of missing data throughout the study period. Intervention households were located in Lynn and Cambridge, MA. Researchers used propensity score matching to create a comparison group of similar households receiving HCVs from similar public housing authorities in Massachusetts, Connecticut, or Rhode Island. Comparison public housing authorities were identified based on the following similar characteristics: employment; average income; poverty level; share of population that was Hispanic, Black, older than age 65, single adult families with a child, and speaking English at home; and population density. Within these public housing authorities, researchers identified three comparison households for each intervention household in Compass FSS using propensity score matching.

Study timing formatted

Families who enrolled from January 2011 to March 2015 were included in the study. Outcomes were examined through March 2016.

Sample Characteristics

Program participants were heads of household who received HCVs. On average, participants in the intervention and comparison groups were 40 years old and had participated in the voucher program for 8 years. Less than one-fifth of participants in each group received cash assistance benefits at the start of services (12 percent in the intervention group and 16 percent in the comparison group).

Implementing organization formatted

Compass Working Group (Compass) is a nonprofit that implemented the program.

Treatment condition formatted

In the intervention group, heads of households receiving HCVs worked with case managers to set goals and build financial capacity. Families paid 30 percent of any increases in earnings toward rent. This increase in rent was credited to an escrow account. If the head of household was employed and completed his or her goals, and if no family members had received Temporary Assistance for Needy Families for at least 12 months, the family received the amount in their escrow account. If they exited the program without completing their goals, they did not receive the funds. Participants in Cambridge received half of the escrow account, rather than the full amount. Typically, goals had to be completed within five years.

Comparison condition formatted

Individuals in the comparison group received HCVs from other public housing authorities.

Mandatory services formatted

None

Setting details formatted

The study took place at public housing agencies in Lynn and Cambridge, MA.

Delivered by public or private entity?
Private
Secondary domains examined

FICO credit scores; SSI, SSDI, Social Security, and pension receipt; Sources of income other than earnings, welfare benefit receipt, or SSI, SSDI, Social Security, or pension receipt

Earliest publication year
2019
Most recent publication year
2019
Manuscripts
Check edits flag
No
Primary Service
Financial incentives
Enrollment Period
January 2011 to March 2015