Skip to sections below

Share this intervention

PrintEmail

Summary

The Baby’s First Years (BFY) Unconditional Cash Transfer provided monthly, predictable unconditional cash transfers to new mothers with low-income to increase household financial resources and encourage investments in child development during the first years of children’s lives. 

The Baby’s First Years (BFY) Unconditional Cash Transfer provided monthly, predictable unconditional cash transfers to new mothers with low-income to increase household financial resources and encourage investments in child development during the first years of children’s lives. Mothers were given a debit card in the hospital, and a cash gift of $333 was loaded into the card monthly. Mothers also had access to a hotline number for assistance with the card use. There were no work-related requirements and no restrictions on how mothers could spend the cash gifts. 

The cash gifts were originally intended to last 40 months but were subsequently extended to last 76 months. 

The study was conducted in New Orleans, LA; New York City, NY; Omaha, NE; and Minneapolis and St. Paul, MN.  

101048-Study of Baby's Firs
Populations and employment barriers: Public benefits recipients, Parents

Effectiveness rating and effect by outcome domain

Need more context or definitions for the Outcome Domain table below?
View the "Table help" to get more insight into terms, measures, and definitions.

View table help

Scroll to the right to view the rest of the table columns

Outcome domain Term Effectiveness rating Effect in 2024 dollars and percentages Effect in standard deviations Sample size
Increase earnings Short-term Little evidence to assess support favorable $73 per year 0.002 911
Long-term Little evidence to assess support unfavorable $-2,734 per year -0.075 911
Very long-term No evidence to assess support
Increase employment Short-term Little evidence to assess support unfavorable -3% (in percentage points) -0.081 931
Long-term Little evidence to assess support favorable 1% (in percentage points) 0.020 922
Very long-term No evidence to assess support
Decrease benefit receipt Short-term Little evidence to assess support $0 per year 0.000 0
Long-term Little evidence to assess support $0 per year 0.000 0
Very long-term No evidence to assess support
Increase education and training All measurement periods Little evidence to assess support 0% (in percentage points) 0.000 0
* This intervention was assessed as supported for this domain, meaning it achieved one or more statistically significant, favorable effects. However, the intervention has an average effect size that is unfavorable because the average includes all effects in this domain - both statistically significant and favorable effects and statistically insignificant but unfavorable effects.

Effectiveness rating key:

  • Well-supported Well-supported   
  • Supported  Supported   
  • Not supported  Not supported   
  • Mixed support  Mixed support   
  • Insufficient evidence  Insufficient evidence   
  • No evidence  No evidence
Effectiveness rating terms?

Studies of this intervention

Study quality rating Study counts per rating
High High 1
Back to top

Implementation details

Dates covered by study

BYF unconditional cash transfer participants were recruited between May 2018 and June 2019 with a follow-up period of three years after enrollment corresponding to the baby’s first, second, and third birthdays. 

Organizations implementing intervention

The program was implemented through local charitable organizations.

Populations served

Eligible mothers had to be low-income adults (18 or older) with full-term infant scheduled for discharge into their custody. The sample was racially and ethnically diverse: 42 percent identified as Hispanic, 39 percent as Black, 11 percent as White (non-Hispanic), and 7 percent as multiple races or other. At baseline, mothers were 27 years old on average, and over 95 percent reported receiving some form of government benefit. 

Description of services implemented

The program utilized a straightforward delivery model for cash transfer: 

  • 4MyBaby Debit Card. Mothers received a co-branded Mastercard debit cards during their hospital stay. The card could not be loaded with money from any other sources.
  • Cash Transfer. A monthly cash gift of $333 was loaded on the debit card on the day of the child’s birth date along with a text message reminder. Mothers received the cash gifts on an opt-out basis.  
  • 4MyBaby Hotline. Mothers could call customer service at the 4MyBaby Hotline with any issues accessing their funds. 

Service intensity

The cash gifts were initially intended to last up to 40 months. Due to additional fundraising and disruptions during the pandemic, cash gifts were extended to 76 months. 

Comparison conditions

The comparison group received a nominal monthly transfer of $20 using the same distribution process. 

Partnerships

Research assistants and students at Teachers College, Columbia University managed the 4MyBaby hotline to address any difficulties in accessing the funds in their debit card. 

Fidelity measures

The study used transaction data and participant uptake rates as indicators of fidelity. The uptake of the cash gift was nearly universal among study participants.  

Funding source

The program was funded by a large coalition of funding sources: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children and Families, Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation; Andrew and Julie Klingenstein Family Fund; Annie E. Casey Foundation; Arrow Impact; BCBS of Louisiana Foundation; Bezos Family Foundation, Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation; Bill Hammack and Janice Parmelee, Brady Education Fund; Chan Zuckerberg Initiative (Silicon Valley Community Foundation); Charles and Lynn Schusterman Family Philanthropies; Child Welfare Fund; Esther A. and Joseph Klingenstein Fund; Ford Foundation; Greater New Orleans Foundation; Heising-Simons Foundation; Jacobs Foundation; JPB Foundation; J-PAL North America; New York City Mayor's Office for Economic Opportunity; Perigee Fund; Robert Wood Johnson Foundation; Sherwood Foundation; Valhalla Foundation; Weitz Family Foundation; W.K. Kellogg Foundation; and three anonymous donors.

The information contained here reflects how the intervention was implemented at the time of the evaluation.

Local context

The study was conducted in New Orleans, LA; New York City, NY; Omaha, NE; and Minneapolis and St. Paul, MN.  

Characteristics of research participants
Black or African American
41%
White, not Hispanic
10%
Another race
4%
More than one race
4%
Hispanic or Latino of any race
41%

The race and ethnicity categories may sum to more than 100 percent if the authors reported race and ethnicity separately; in these cases, we report the category White, rather than White, not Hispanic.

State(s) where implemented

AL AK AZ AR CA CO CT DE DC FL GA HI ID IL IN IA KS KY LA ME MD MA MI MN MS MO MT NE NV NH NJ NM NY NC ND OH OK OR PA RI SC SD TN TX UT VT VA WA WV WI WY Canada

The Pathways Clearinghouse refers to interventions by the names used in study reports or manuscripts. Some intervention names may use language that is not consistent with our style guide, preferences, or the terminology we use to describe populations.