Submitted by user on
Study Name
Year Up
Study Sharepoint ID
2947
Evaluation name
Year Up
Intervention (standard name)
Strength of Evidence Tag
Reason for the Rating

This study received a low study quality rating because it is a high-attrition randomized controlled trial that does not demonstrate that the intervention and comparison groups were sufficiently similar before the intervention.

This study received a low study quality rating because it is a high-attrition randomized controlled trial that does not demonstrate that the intervention and comparison groups were sufficiently similar before the intervention.

Populations targeted
Settings in which the intervention was studied
Characteristics
Percent Young Adults
100.00
Percent Asian
3.00
Percent Black or African American
50.00
Percent Hispanic or Latino of any race
34.00
Percent White not Hispanic
5.00
Percent another race
7.00
Group formation formatted

Eligible applicants to the Year Up program’s Boston, MA; New York City, NY; and Providence, RI sites were randomly assigned by evaluators to the intervention or comparison groups with an approximately 70 percent probability of assignment to the intervention group. Individuals were randomly assigned in September 2007 and followed through September 2011. The study reports both intent-to-treat and treatment-on-treated estimates of impacts.

Study timing formatted

Individuals were randomly assigned in September 2007 and followed through September 2011.

Implementing organization formatted

Year Up and local colleges

Treatment condition formatted

Year Up offered young adults six months of technical skills training in information technology or investment operations fields. Year Up also included classes in business writing and communication, professional skills training, opportunities to earn college credit, and a six-month internship with a top company in the region. Participants received a weekly stipend and the support of social workers and mentors. Those who completed the program received job search or college application assistance.

Comparison condition formatted

Evaluators placed young adults assigned to the comparison condition on a 10-month waitlist and told those participants they could attend Year Up at that time. In the meantime, participants could participate in any education and training activities available to them in the community.

Mandatory services formatted

None.

Delivered by public or private entity?
Private
Secondary domains examined

Job characteristics

Earliest publication year
2011
Most recent publication year
2011
Manuscripts
Check edits flag
No
Primary Service
Job development/job placement
Enrollment Period
7-Sep
Intervention Duration
10.00