Submitted by user on
Study Name
Cognitive Behavioral Intervention for Justice-Involved Individuals Seeking Employment (CBI-Emp)
Study Sharepoint ID
37960
Evaluation name
Building Bridges and Bonds (B3)
Strength of Evidence Tag
Reason for the Rating

This study received a high study quality rating because it is a low-attrition randomized controlled trial with no known issues that suggest the findings cannot be attributed to the intervention.

This study received a high study quality rating because it is a low-attrition randomized controlled trial with no known issues that suggest the findings cannot be attributed to the intervention.

Populations targeted
Settings in which the intervention was studied

Subgroups

Subgroup data - Female
No
Subgroup data - Male
No
Subgroup data - White
No
Subgroup data - Black
No
Count age
0
Count Young Adults
0
Count Hard-to-employ
0
Count Disability
0
Count chronically ill
0
Count mentally ill
0
Count substance dependent
0
Count formerly incarcerated
0
Count Justice involved
0
Count limited work history
0
Count homeless
0
Count immigrants
0
Count refugees
0
Count veterans
0
Count female
0
Count Male
0
Count Any postsecondary education
0
Count With a high school diploma or GED
0
Count No high school diploma or GED
0
Count Married
0
Count Parents
0
Count Single Parents
0
Count Non-Custodial Parents
0
Count Employed
0
Count Self employed
0
Count Unemployed
0
Count Disconnected/discouraged workers
0
Count general low-income population
0
Count Very low income (as classified by the authors)
0
Count welfare population
0
Count long-term welfare recipients
0
Count Asian
0
Count Black or African American
0
Count Hispanic or Latino of any race
0
Count American Indian or Alaska Native
0
Count Pacific islander
0
Count White
0
Count White not Hispanic
0
Count More than one race
0
Count Unknown race
0
Count another race
0
Percent fomerly incarcerated
95.80
Percent Justice involved
100.00
Percent Male
100.00
Percent Any postsecondary education
25.60
Percent No high school diploma or GED
25.60
Percent With a high school diploma or GED
74.50
Percent Married
11.00
Percent Parents
100.00
Percent Employed
27.10
Percent Black or African American
70.70
Percent Hispanic or Latino of any race
15.70
Percent White not Hispanic
8.90
Percent another race
4.70
Mean age
37.50
Group formation formatted

The study used random assignment across three sites. Staff at the sites recruited participants through community outreach and community partnerships, such as partnerships with probation and patrol officers. Organizations did not actively recruit from other community-based organizations that offered similar cognitive behavioral interventions. Eligible fathers completed intake, informed consent, and preliminary surveys on demographics and skills. Staff randomly assigned 752 fathers to the CBI-Emp group (375) or a comparison group (377). Ten fathers who were eligible but did not consent to participate in the study received services if they were randomly assigned to the intervention group, but they were not included in the study sample. To be eligible, fathers had to be involved with the justice system in the prior three years, be 18 or older, have a child younger than 25, and be moderately to highly likely to experience future involvement in the justice system, as measured by an intake assessment. Justice involvement could include being convicted of a crime, being incarcerated, or being on probation or parole.

Study timing formatted

The study randomly assigned people from October 2016 to December 2018, and examined information on outcomes for up to 12 months following random assignment.

Study funding formatted

ACF, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

Sample Characteristics

All participants were fathers with recent justice involvement. More than half (55 percent) were currently on parole, probation, or community supervision, and 48 percent had been released from incarceration in the previous six months. Most (71 percent) were Black or African American, not Hispanic. About one-quarter of participants (27 percent) were working at the time of random assignment, and 37 percent had participated in cognitive behavioral services before.

Implementing organization formatted

Three community-based organizations provided the intervention: Passages, Inc. in Cleveland, OH; the Fortune Society in New York, NY; and Kanawha Institute for Social Research and Action, Inc. in Dunbar, WV.

Program history

CBI-Emp was first pilot tested from October 2015 to March 2016. This study aimed to determine whether the program could be integrated into current fatherhood program services and, if so, whether it would affect employment and earnings.

Treatment condition formatted

CBI-Emp provided fathers who had prior justice involvement with two weeks of workshops covering five modules: motivational engagement, cognitive restructuring, emotional regulation and social skills, problem-solving, and success planning. The workshops were intended to teach cognitive behavioral skills that could help participants become job ready and maintain employment. The study offered 20 of 31 workshop sessions developed by the University of Cincinnati Corrections Institute. The study intended for participants to attend a minimum of 12 of 14 skill-based sessions, and up to 6 application sessions in which participants could build individual plans for success at work. Three organizations delivered the program at separate sites in Ohio, New York, and West Virginia. Participants received financial incentives from $25 to $75 for completing a certain number of sessions; the amounts and numbers of sessions needed to receive incentives varied across the organizations. In the weeks before CBI-Emp workshops, the organizations offered the same initial services to the participants and to the comparison group. Across the organizations, the duration of these initial services varied from three to eight weeks. The service models varied, but all included optional work readiness activities, such as workshops focused on interviewing skills and resume writing, case management, job development, and parenting and healthy relationship workshops.

Comparison condition formatted

The comparison group received fatherhood and traditional job readiness services as usual at one of the three participating organizations. Across the organizations, the duration of these services varied from three to eight weeks. The service models varied, but all included optional work readiness activities such as workshops focused on interviewing skills and resume writing, case management, job development, and parenting and healthy relationship workshops. The fathers were not eligible to attend CBI-Emp workshops.

Mandatory services formatted

None

Timing of study formatted

The CBI-Emp workshops lasted two weeks.

Program funding formatted

The programs were funded by different sources, including Healthy Marriage and Responsible Fatherhood grants.

Setting details formatted

The study took place in the three locations of the participating organizations: Cleveland, OH; New York, NY; and Dunbar, WV.

Delivered by public or private entity?
Private
Secondary domains examined

Criminal justice, relationships with co-parents, cognitive function, economic well-being, child support, and transportation

Earliest publication year
2021
Most recent publication year
2021
Manuscripts
Check edits flag
No
Primary Service
Soft skills training
Enrollment Period
October 2016 to December 2018
Intervention Duration
0.00
Subgroup data - Hispanic
No
Intervention Cost
$1228
Comparison cost
$0