Submitted by user on
Study Name
Youth Villages LifeSet (YVLifeSet)
Study Sharepoint ID
7730
Evaluation name
Youth Villages Transitional Living Evaluation
Intervention (standard name)
Strength of Evidence Tag
Reason for the Rating

This study received a high study quality rating because it is a low-attrition randomized controlled trial with no known issues that suggest the findings cannot be attributed to the intervention.

This study received a high study quality rating because it is a low-attrition randomized controlled trial with no known issues that suggest the findings cannot be attributed to the intervention.

Populations targeted
Settings in which the intervention was studied

Subgroups

Subgroup data - Female
No
Subgroup data - Male
No
Subgroup data - White
No
Subgroup data - Black
No
Count age
0
Count Young Adults
0
Count Hard-to-employ
0
Count Disability
0
Count chronically ill
0
Count mentally ill
0
Count substance dependent
0
Count formerly incarcerated
0
Count Justice involved
0
Count limited work history
0
Count homeless
0
Count immigrants
0
Count refugees
0
Count veterans
0
Count female
0
Count Male
0
Count Any postsecondary education
0
Count With a high school diploma or GED
0
Count No high school diploma or GED
0
Count Married
0
Count Parents
0
Count Single Parents
0
Count Non-Custodial Parents
0
Count Employed
0
Count Self employed
0
Count Unemployed
0
Count Disconnected/discouraged workers
0
Count general low-income population
0
Count Very low income (as classified by the authors)
0
Count welfare population
0
Count long-term welfare recipients
0
Count Asian
0
Count Black or African American
0
Count Hispanic or Latino of any race
0
Count American Indian or Alaska Native
0
Count Pacific islander
0
Count White
0
Count White not Hispanic
0
Count More than one race
0
Count Unknown race
0
Count another race
0
Percent Young Adults
100.00
Percent female
48.00
Percent Male
52.00
Percent No high school diploma or GED
17.00
Percent With a high school diploma or GED
57.30
Percent Married
6.00
Percent Employed
42.80
Percent Unemployed
19.20
Percent Black or African American
37.10
Percent Hispanic or Latino of any race
5.80
Percent White not Hispanic
51.10
Group formation formatted

From October 2010 to October 2012, youth in state custody (through the child protection system or the juvenile justice system) who were near their 18th birthday and interested in the program met with program staff, completed a consent form, and were randomly assigned to the YVLifeSet condition or a comparison condition. Applicants were eligible for the study if they had been in state custody for at least one year after age 14, or had been in state custody while age 17; did not have histories of severe violence, mental health problems, drug use, or developmental delays; and were deemed capable of living independently with support. A total of 1,322 people were randomly assigned to the intervention group (788) or the comparison group (534).

Study timing formatted

The program was studied over two years.

Study funding formatted

The YVLifeSet evaluation was funded by the Edna McConnell Clark Foundation, the Annie E. Casey Foundation, and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.

Sample Characteristics

People involved in the study were ages 18 to 24, with most (71 percent) age 18 at the start of the study. About half (51 percent) were White, not Hispanic; 40 percent were still enrolled in high school; and 17 percent did not have a high school diploma or GED and were not enrolled in school.

Implementing organization formatted

Youth Villages

Program history

YVLifeSet (originally called Youth Villages Transitional Living Program) was developed in 1999 by Youth Villages in Memphis, TN.

Treatment condition formatted

Youth in state custody (through the child protection system or the juvenile justice system) received individualized case management, including weekly meetings with a transitional living specialist. Transitional living specialists used practices such as motivational interviewing and trauma-focused cognitive behavioral therapy. Participants also received soft skills training, supportive services, and other services to encourage independent living, education, and work.

Comparison condition formatted

Participants randomly assigned to the comparison group could not receive YVLifeSet services but received a list of other resources in the community.

Mandatory services formatted

None

Timing of study formatted

Participants typically received services for 9 to 12 months.

Program funding formatted

Tennessee Department of Children’s Services, Day Foundation

Setting details formatted

Tennessee

Delivered by public or private entity?
Private
Secondary domains examined

Housing, economic hardship, social support, health, safety, and recidivism

Earliest publication year
2015
Most recent publication year
2019
Manuscripts
Check edits flag
No
Primary Service
Case management
Enrollment Period
October 2010 to October 2012
Intervention Duration
0.00
Subgroup data - Hispanic
No
Intervention Cost
$11825
Comparison cost
$0