Submitted by user on
Study Name
Demonstration to Maintain Independence and Employment (DMIE)
Study Sharepoint ID
28522
Evaluation name
Demonstration to Maintain Independence and Employment (DMIE)
Strength of Evidence Tag
Reason for the Rating

This study received a low study quality rating because the implementation of the randomized controlled trial was compromised and it does not adjust estimated impacts for potentially important differences between the intervention and comparison groups.

This study received a low study quality rating because the implementation of the randomized controlled trial was compromised and the study does not adjust estimated impacts for potentially important differences between the intervention and comparison groups.

Populations targeted
Settings in which the intervention was studied

Subgroups

Subgroup data - Female
No
Subgroup data - Male
No
Subgroup data - White
No
Subgroup data - Black
No
Count age
0
Count Young Adults
0
Count Hard-to-employ
0
Count Disability
0
Count chronically ill
0
Count mentally ill
0
Count substance dependent
0
Count formerly incarcerated
0
Count Justice involved
0
Count limited work history
0
Count homeless
0
Count immigrants
0
Count refugees
0
Count veterans
0
Count female
0
Count Male
0
Count Any postsecondary education
0
Count With a high school diploma or GED
0
Count No high school diploma or GED
0
Count Married
0
Count Parents
0
Count Single Parents
0
Count Non-Custodial Parents
0
Count Employed
0
Count Self employed
0
Count Unemployed
0
Count Disconnected/discouraged workers
0
Count general low-income population
0
Count Very low income (as classified by the authors)
0
Count welfare population
0
Count long-term welfare recipients
0
Count Asian
0
Count Black or African American
0
Count Hispanic or Latino of any race
0
Count American Indian or Alaska Native
0
Count Pacific islander
0
Count White
0
Count White not Hispanic
0
Count More than one race
0
Count Unknown race
0
Count another race
0
Percent Disability
100.00
Percent mentally ill
100.00
Percent female
69.77
Percent Any postsecondary education
48.94
Percent No high school diploma or GED
20.41
Percent With a high school diploma or GED
29.11
Percent Married
23.98
Percent Asian
1.20
Percent Black or African American
27.50
Percent Hispanic or Latino of any race
20.22
Percent White not Hispanic
46.14
Percent More than one race
2.36
Percent unknown race
1.76
Mean age
43.40
Group formation formatted

Individuals determined eligible to participate were randomly assigned to the intervention or comparison group. Participants were eligible for the study if they were ages 18-62, had a mental illness, worked at least 40 hours per month, were not receiving other public benefits, and were not receiving Supplemental Security Income or Social Security Disability Insurance Benefits. DMIE enrollment in Minnesota focused on eligible workers with a behavioral health diagnosis who were participating in a means-tested public insurance program, and Texas enrollment focused on eligible workers who were members of a safety net program in the Houston area and had a behavioral health diagnosis co-occurring with a physical impairment. In Minnesota, participants were randomly assigned with a 3:1 ratio to the intervention and comparison groups, using a stratified random sample based on age, functional status, geographic location, and income. In Texas, participants were randomly assigned with equal probability of being in the intervention or comparison group.

Study timing formatted

Random assignment was conducted between January 2007 and July 2008, and participant outcomes were measured for two years after enrollment in the study.

Implementing organization formatted

Minnesota Department of Human Services; Texas Health and Human Services Commission Working Well Program

Treatment condition formatted

Adults ages 18 to 62 who were working at least part time and had a behavioral health condition were eligible to participate in the Demonstration to Maintain Independence and Employment (DMIE) in Texas and Minnesota. DMIE participants in these states could receive a suite of services including intensive case management, health benefits supplementing their existing coverage, employment supports, and financial assistance. Intensive case management involved developing an individual plan and goals and addressing barriers to services. Health benefits included enhanced medical services such as chemical dependence treatment, expanded dental coverage, medical transportation, improved access to mental health services, and a subsidized health club membership. Employment supports included career counseling, access to a 24-hour employee assistance program, a peer support group, workplace visits, accommodation assessments, and résumé and interview skill building. Financial assistance included health care premium subsidies, lower health insurance co-payments, and low or no deductibles for health care.

Comparison condition formatted

The comparison condition applied to adults ages 18 to 62 who were working at least part time and had a behavioral health condition, but did not receive enhanced health services, employment supports, or financial assistance related to health insurance. Comparison group members remained eligible to receive standard health services in their community.

Mandatory services formatted

None

Setting details formatted

The program took place in seven counties in Minnesota and Texas, including the Twin Cities, MN, and Houston, TX, metropolitan areas and rural counties. The intervention was administered through two Minnesota public health programs, MinnesotaCare and General Assistance Medical Care, and a Texas county hospital district health services program.

Delivered by public or private entity?
Public
Secondary domains examined

Physical and mental health; Disability benefit applications

Earliest publication year
2009
Most recent publication year
2014
Check edits flag
No
Primary Service
Health services
Subgroup data - Hispanic
No