Submitted by user on
Study Name
Post-Employment Services Demonstration (PESD)—Riverside
Study Sharepoint ID
3074.03
Evaluation name
Post-Employment Services Demonstration (PESD)
Characteristics

Subgroups

Subgroup data - Female
No
Subgroup data - Male
No
Subgroup data - White
No
Subgroup data - Black
No
Percent female
92.00
Percent Male
8.00
Percent Any postsecondary education
17.20
Percent No high school diploma or GED
36.60
Percent With a high school diploma or GED
63.40
Percent Employed
100.00
Percent welfare population
100.00
Percent Black or African American
17.10
Percent Hispanic or Latino of any race
33.40
Percent White
47.20
Mean age
31.90
Group formation formatted

In Riverside, California, evaluators identified newly employed welfare recipients who had been referred to or participated in Job Opportunities and Basic Skills Training (JOBS). The research team randomly assigned people to either the Post-Employment Services Demonstration (PESD) group or to a comparison group. Among the 1,506 newly employed welfare recipients identified, 500 (33.2 percent) were randomly assigned to the intervention group. Researchers attempted to collect administrative records for every person in the study; about one year after random assignment, researchers selected a random subsample of 428 newly employed welfare recipients (who enrolled in the demonstration between July 1994 and August 1995) for a follow-up survey .

Study timing formatted

Individuals were randomly assigned from March 1994 to December 1995 and were followed for two years thereafter.

Study funding formatted

The Office of Planning, Research, and Evaluation in ACF at the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services funded the study.

Sample Characteristics

On average, sample members were 32 years old. Most sample members were female (92 percent) and, on average, their households included two children, the youngest of whom was 6 years old. About one-third of sample members had not, at the time of random assignment, completed high school or a received a GED. All people in the study were required to participate in the JOBS program. About 97 percent received Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC) all of the year before random assignment. Nearly 10 percent reported receiving welfare most of the time while growing up.

Implementing organization formatted

Riverside County AFDC/Temporary Assistance for Needy Families

Program history

The program was a demonstration program implemented for the first time during the evaluation.

Treatment condition formatted

Between spring 1994 and fall 1996, California received waivers for its AFDC program and JOBS rules to provide additional case management services and financial support to newly employed welfare recipients in Riverside. PESD case managers provided people enrolled in PESD with counseling and support, job search assistance, help with benefits, and service referrals tailored to the needs of individual recipients. The program also increased the amount of financial support available to newly employed welfare recipients for initial employment expenses and expanded the range of eligible expenses.

Comparison condition formatted

Sample members assigned to the comparison group received the regular services available to employed welfare recipients in California. In Riverside, most AFDC recipients who found jobs remained eligible for AFDC and had access to job search and other assistance available to AFDC recipients if they lost their job.

Mandatory services formatted

All participants were required to participate in JOBS to receive benefits.

Timing of study formatted

The program expected to maintain contact with all clients during the first few months after they became employed, then expected the need for contact to decline. Case managers still had contact with about half of treatment group members one year after they became employed.

Program funding formatted

ACF, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

Setting details formatted

Riverside, CA

Delivered by public or private entity?
Public
Secondary domains examined

The study reports employment, earnings, and public benefit receipt outcomes for other months and quarters that are not the focus of this review.

Earliest publication year
1998
Most recent publication year
1999
Manuscripts
Check edits flag
No
Primary Service
Employment retention services
Enrollment Period
March 1994 to December 1995
Subgroup data - Hispanic
No