Submitted by user on
Study Name
Bridge to Employment in the Healthcare Industry (BTH)
Study Sharepoint ID
24989.04
Evaluation name
Pathways for Advancing Careers and Education (PACE)
Strength of Evidence Tag
Reason for the Rating

This study received a high study quality rating because it is a low-attrition randomized controlled trial with no known issues that suggest the findings cannot be attributed to the intervention.

This study received a high study quality rating because it is a low-attrition randomized controlled trial with no known issues that suggest the findings cannot be attributed to the intervention.

Settings in which the intervention was studied
Percent female
83.70
Percent Male
16.30
Percent Any postsecondary education
60.00
Percent No high school diploma or GED
3.60
Percent With a high school diploma or GED
96.40
Percent general low-income population
100.00
Percent Black or African American
21.60
Percent Hispanic or Latino of any race
46.50
Percent White not Hispanic
19.50
Percent another race
15.00
Group formation formatted

Participants were eligible for the study if they were at least 18 years of age, received Temporary Assistance for Needy Families assistance at the time of random assignment or met the study's definition of having a low income, held their high school diploma or GED, were eligible to work in the United States, and were residents of San Diego County. Participants were also required to achieve a minimum score on a basic skills exam. A total of 1,007 eligible people were randomly assigned to the intervention condition (507) or to the comparison condition (500) from July 2012 to October 2013.

Study timing formatted

Random assignment occurred from July 2012 to October 2013, and follow-up occurred 18 months and 3 years after random assignment.

Study funding formatted

ACF, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

Sample Characteristics

About one-third (32 percent) of the research sample was age 24 or younger, another one-third (32 percent) was ages 25 to 34, and one-third (36 percent) was 35 years of age or older. Most participants were female (84 percent). Nearly half of the sample (47 percent) was Hispanic, about one-fifth (22 percent) was Black, and about one-fifth (20 percent) was White. Only 4 percent lacked a high school diploma or the equivalent certification, and most (60 percent) had at least some postsecondary education.

Implementing organization formatted

Three community-based organizations (Comprehensive Training Services, Metropolitan Area Advisory Committee, and North County Lifeline) implemented the program.

Program history

Bridge to Employment was established in 2010 through a Health Profession Opportunity Grant. It began offering services about two years before the start of randomization into the Pathways for Advancing Careers and Education study in July 2012. The program ended in September 2015 when its Health Profession Opportunity Grant ended.

Treatment condition formatted

Bridge to Employment in the Healthcare Industry participants were residents of San Diego County with low incomes who were interested in occupations in the health care field. Participants first met with a counselor who helped them select a training program that was a strong fit. Training programs could be any accredited training program in San Diego County within three occupational health care groups: patient care, technical, or administrative. The counselor also identified any participation barriers participants might face and connected them to appropriate supportive services (worth up to $1,000), such as transportation or child care assistance. Participants received Individual Training Accounts, which were funds to cover the cost of the training. The program offered up to $7,000 in funding for most training programs, but up to $10,000 was offered for certain fields. Finally, the program provided employment services and job search assistance after participants completed their training programs.

Comparison condition formatted

People in the comparison condition could access training programs offered in the community. Temporary Assistance for Needy Families recipients in the comparison group also received case management, certain supportive services, and employment services.

Mandatory services formatted

None

Timing of study formatted

People received services for an average of 4.9 months.

Program funding formatted

ACF, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

Setting details formatted

The study took place in San Diego County, CA. Community-based organizations provided the services.

Delivered by public or private entity?
Private
Secondary domains examined

Psychosocial skills, life stressors, child outcomes, parental engagement, and family economic well-being

Earliest publication year
2017
Most recent publication year
2020
Manuscripts
Check edits flag
No
Primary Service
Supportive services
Enrollment Period
July 2012 to October 2013
Intervention Duration
4.90
Intervention Cost
$5593
Comparison cost
$2305