Submitted by user on
Study Name
Texas Employment Retention and Advancement (ERA)—Single parents in Corpus Christi
Study Sharepoint ID
4.3094.06
Evaluation name
Employment Retention and Advancement (ERA) Project
Strength of Evidence Tag
Reason for the Rating

This study received a high study quality rating because it is a low-attrition randomized controlled trial with no known issues that suggest the findings cannot be attributed to the intervention.

This study received a high study quality rating because it is a low-attrition randomized controlled trial with no known issues that suggest the findings cannot be attributed to the intervention.

Populations targeted
Settings in which the intervention was studied
Characteristics

Subgroups

Subgroup data - Female
No
Subgroup data - Male
No
Subgroup data - White
No
Subgroup data - Black
No
Percent female
94.30
Percent Male
5.70
Percent Any postsecondary education
6.30
Percent No high school diploma or GED
51.70
Percent With a high school diploma or GED
48.30
Percent Parents
100.00
Percent Single Parents
100.00
Percent Employed
8.80
Percent Black or African American
8.10
Percent Hispanic or Latino of any race
73.90
Percent White not Hispanic
15.80
Percent another race
2.20
Mean age
28.50
Group formation formatted

From October 2000 through December 2002, 1,727 single-parent participants in Corpus Christi, TX, were randomly assigned to the ERA program or Choices program (comparison group) after Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) eligibility had been confirmed but before receiving cash assistance. Participants assigned to the ERA program attended a TANF orientation. They then received cash assistance and began to participate in ERA activities. Participation in the ERA and Choices conditions was mandatory for the majority of those randomly assigned. Participants from two-parent families were also randomly assigned but were analyzed separately. The study authors attempted to survey all single parents, age 18 or older, who spoke English or Spanish, and who were randomly assigned between January and June 2002, about 12 months after study enrollment.

Study timing formatted

Random assignment began in November 2000 and continued through December 2002. Evaluators followed up with participants for four years after random assignment.

Study funding formatted

The Office of Planning, Research, and Evaluation in ACF at the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services funded the study, with support from the U.S. Department of Labor.

Sample Characteristics

Study participants were single parents who had applied for TANF. (Some, though not all, were approved.) Based on the sample randomly assigned in November 2000 through December 2002, at baseline, almost all individuals were not employed (91 percent) and female (94 percent), with an average age between 28 and 29 years old. Most (74 percent) were Hispanic, 16 percent were White, and 8 percent were Black. Fifty-two percent did not have a high school diploma or GED. Thirty-nine percent had not received TANF before the study.

Implementing organization formatted

A nonprofit organization under contract with the local workforce board provided the services.

Program history

The Texas Department of Human Services and Texas Workforce Commission developed the program in 1999 for use in the ERA study.

Treatment condition formatted

TANF recipients assigned to the Texas ERA program attended an initial orientation and then a four-day job search workshop. They then spent four to six weeks searching for jobs. The program assigned those who did not secure employment to community service or volunteer positions. People who found jobs were eligible for a $200 monthly stipend for up to 12 months if they were employed for at least 30 hours per week, participated in a post-employment advancement activity, or left TANF; they could also be eligible for the stipend if they worked 15 hours per week and participated in an education and training activity. The first four months of earnings for people in the program were disregarded when calculating their eligibility for TANF. Texas ERA staff also helped clients address job-related problems and provided reemployment assistance and support in meeting stipend requirements. Program staff made regular employer site visits. Participants were eligible for these services as long as they were eligible for the monthly stipend. Program staff coordinated case management services (including employment assessment, goal setting and career planning, support services, barrier resolution, and job search assistance) across several partner agencies.

Comparison condition formatted

TANF recipients assigned to Texas's standard welfare-to-work program (called Choices) received job search assistance, case management services, and support services after attending an orientation session. They spent four to six weeks searching for jobs, after which those who did not find employment were assigned to community service or volunteer positions. Clients could have four months of earnings disregarded when calculating their TANF benefit amount and could receive post-employment services during those four months. Case management services included employment assessment, goal setting and career planning, support services, barrier resolution, and job search assistance, but the services were not as intensive or coordinated across agencies as they were in the Texas ERA program.

Mandatory services formatted

Participation in ERA was mandatory for all individuals, except those who had a child younger than 1, were ill or disabled, or were caring for a disabled family member.

Timing of study formatted

Preemployment services lasted up to 7 weeks, and financial incentives for job retention lasted up to 12 months.

Program funding formatted

Texas TANF agency (primary);  ACF, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

Setting details formatted

The study took place in Corpus Christi, TX.

Delivered by public or private entity?
Private
Secondary domains examined

Physical health, Family formation, Child well-being

Earliest publication year
2005
Most recent publication year
2010
Check edits flag
No
Primary Service
Employment retention services
Enrollment Period
November 2000 to December 2002
Intervention Duration
12.00
Subgroup data - Hispanic
No