Submitted by user on
Study Name
Career Builders
Study Sharepoint ID
3138
Evaluation name
Employment Retention and Advancement (ERA) Project
Intervention (standard name)
Strength of Evidence Tag
Reason for the Rating

This study received a high study quality rating because it is a low-attrition randomized controlled trial with no known issues that suggest the findings cannot be attributed to the intervention.

This study received a high study quality rating because it is a low-attrition randomized controlled trial with no known issues that suggest the findings cannot be attributed to the intervention.

Settings in which the intervention was studied
Characteristics
Count age
0
Count Young Adults
0
Count Hard-to-employ
0
Count Disability
0
Count chronically ill
0
Count mentally ill
0
Count substance dependent
0
Count formerly incarcerated
0
Count Justice involved
0
Count limited work history
0
Count homeless
0
Count immigrants
0
Count refugees
0
Count veterans
0
Count female
0
Count Male
0
Count Any postsecondary education
0
Count With a high school diploma or GED
0
Count No high school diploma or GED
0
Count Married
0
Count Parents
0
Count Single Parents
0
Count Non-Custodial Parents
0
Count Employed
0
Count Self employed
0
Count Unemployed
0
Count Disconnected/discouraged workers
0
Count general low-income population
0
Count Very low income (as classified by the authors)
0
Count welfare population
0
Count long-term welfare recipients
0
Count Asian
0
Count Black or African American
0
Count Hispanic or Latino of any race
0
Count American Indian or Alaska Native
0
Count Pacific islander
0
Count White
0
Count More than one race
0
Count Unknown race
0
Percent female
95.70
Percent Male
4.30
Percent No high school diploma or GED
34.10
Percent With a high school diploma or GED
65.90
Percent Parents
100.00
Percent Single Parents
100.00
Percent welfare population
100.00
Percent Black or African American
39.40
Percent Hispanic or Latino of any race
7.20
Percent White not Hispanic
42.70
Percent another race
10.70
Mean age
30.40
Group formation formatted

Random assignment occurred between May 31, 2002, and February 26, 2003. Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) recipients and applicants were ineligible for the study if someone in their family was already randomly assigned or if they were noncitizens, did not speak English, received Supplemental Security Income, or were incapacitated. The random assignment procedure differed for TANF recipients and applicants. TANF recipients were identified for the study if they had received TANF previously or had lost a job in the prior two years and needed a TANF eligibility redetermination. Recipients deemed eligible for the study and eligible for continued TANF receipt were given an appointment for random assignment and, if they arrived at that appointment, were randomly assigned. TANF applicants were required to first attend an assessment that helped them identify employment barriers and search for employment for 45 days. Those who did not find a job after 45 days were screened for eligibility for TANF receipt and, if eligible for the study, were randomly assigned. In total, 634 individuals were randomly assigned from May 2002 to February 2003.

Study timing formatted

Random assignment began in May 2002 and concluded in February 2003. Two years of follow-up data are available for all participants.

Study funding formatted

The Office of Planning, Research, and Evaluation in ACF at the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services funded the study, with support from the U.S. Department of Labor.

Sample Characteristics

The study examined only single parents eligible to receive TANF. More than 95 percent of sample members were female, and 43 percent were White, 39 percent were Black, and 7 percent were Hispanic. The average age was 30. About one-third (34 percent) lacked a high school diploma or equivalent certificate. Fifty-four percent had worked in the year before random assignment, and 62 percent had worked fewer than 12 months in the past three years.

Implementing organization formatted

Oregon TANF, Mount Hood Community College, and Portland Community College

Program history

The Career Builders program grew out of the Portland TANF program, Steps to Success.

Treatment condition formatted

The Career Builders program aimed to take a holistic approach to assisting individuals in finding and maintaining employment. Each participant was assigned a case manager, an employment specialist, a mental health specialist, and a community resource expert to help with these goals. In addition, the program began with a two-week, daily class designed to help individuals understand why they had not succeeded previously in the labor market, including extensive screening to identify barriers to employment and to identify individuals' strengths and interests. The program provided direct referrals to education and training programs and offered peer support classes to help participants establish a resource network. Participants were also intended to meet individually with an employment specialist to develop a long-term career plan and to discuss issues that arose once they found employment. However, owing to lack of funds and support from administrators and some staff, post-employment services were not implemented.

Comparison condition formatted

Participants in the comparison group received standard TANF services, including case management, formulation of a preemployment development plan, and minimal follow-up after obtaining employment.

Mandatory services formatted

Participation in the Career Builders program was mandatory.

Timing of study formatted

Not specified.

Program funding formatted

Oregon TANF

Setting details formatted

The study took place in Portland, OR.

Delivered by public or private entity?
Public
Secondary domains examined

None

Earliest publication year
2008
Most recent publication year
2008
Manuscripts
Check edits flag
No
Primary Service
Case management
Enrollment Period
May 2002 to February 2003