Intervention description

Atlanta’s HCD program stressed that participants should spend time receiving education or training to prepare for good jobs. At the start of the program, case managers assigned participants to adult basic education courses or vocational training programs. Participants were assigned to adult basic education courses more often than training programs because many vocational programs required GEDs or certificates that the participants did not have when starting the HCD program. Case managers had limited individualized involvement with participants but emphasized the importance of participation and supported participants by offering child care and transportation assistance when needed. Case managers could enforce participation rules by imposing sanctions on nonparticipating clients that temporarily reduced their welfare grant amounts by $45 for a family of three (in 1993 dollars). The sanction could last until the participant agreed to participate in the program activity. The program expected that most participants would complete training or educational activities within two years but approved longer durations based on participant needs.

The program focused on single-parent AFDC recipients who were required to enroll in the Job Opportunities and Basic Skills program. AFDC recipients were exempt from the enrollment requirement if they (1) had children younger than 1; (2) had 3 or more children younger than 10; (3) were employed 30 hours or more per week; (4) were medically unable to work; (5) were in the last trimester of pregnancy; (6) had resided in a mental institution at all during the previous 5 years; (7) had been enrolled in a rehabilitation center; or (8) were taking medication for a mental illness.

Atlanta’s HCD program, implemented in Atlanta, GA, was evaluated as part of the National Evaluation of Welfare-to-Work Strategies that also tested HCD programs implemented in Riverside, CA, and Grand Rapids, MI. The demonstration also compared the effectiveness of Labor Force Attachment programs versus HCD programs in Atlanta, GA; Grand Rapids, MI; and Riverside, CA, and evaluated programs in Portland, OR; Detroit, MI; Oklahoma City, OK; and two programs in Columbus, OH (Columbus Integrated and Columbus Traditional).

Year evaluation began
1991
State & Region
Short intervention description

To help participants secure jobs that could lead to economic self-sufficiency, Atlanta’s HCD program focused on providing education and training to single parents who were Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC) recipients.

Count well supported or supported domains
3
Count Well supported domains
0
Count supported domains
3
Count not supported
0
Count domains examined
7
Count domains not examined
3
has evidence
Well-supported or supported evidence of effectiveness in at least one outcome domain
Covid-19 Impact
No
Characteristics
Percent another race
0.00
Percent Asian
0.00
Percent Black or African American
95.00
Percent Hispanic or Latino of any race
1.00
Percent American Indian or Alaska Native
0.10
Percent Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0.00
Percent Pacific islander
0.00
Percent White
4.00
Percent White not Hispanic
0.00
Percent More than one race
0.00
Percent unknown race
0.00
Percent Unknown or not reported
0.00
Intervention Primary Service