Submitted by user on
Study Name
The Self-Sufficiency Project (SSP)—Income Assistance (IA) Applicants
Study Sharepoint ID
3001.3343.01
Evaluation name
Self-Sufficiency Project (SSP)
Intervention (standard name)
Strength of Evidence Tag
Reason for the Rating

This study received a high study quality rating because it is a low-attrition randomized controlled trial with no known issues that suggest the findings cannot be attributed to the intervention.

This study received a high study quality rating because it is a low-attrition randomized controlled trial with no known issues that suggest the findings cannot be attributed to the intervention.

Populations targeted
Settings in which the intervention was studied
Characteristics

Subgroups

Subgroup data - Female
No
Subgroup data - Male
No
Subgroup data - White
No
Subgroup data - Black
No
Count age
0
Count Young Adults
0
Count Hard-to-employ
0
Count Disability
0
Count chronically ill
0
Count mentally ill
0
Count substance dependent
0
Count formerly incarcerated
0
Count Justice involved
0
Count limited work history
0
Count homeless
0
Count immigrants
0
Count refugees
0
Count veterans
0
Count female
0
Count Male
0
Count Any postsecondary education
0
Count With a high school diploma or GED
0
Count No high school diploma or GED
0
Count Married
0
Count Parents
0
Count Single Parents
0
Count Non-Custodial Parents
0
Count Employed
0
Count Self employed
0
Count Unemployed
0
Count Disconnected/discouraged workers
0
Count general low-income population
0
Count Very low income (as classified by the authors)
0
Count welfare population
0
Count long-term welfare recipients
0
Count Asian
0
Count Black or African American
0
Count Hispanic or Latino of any race
0
Count American Indian or Alaska Native
0
Count Pacific islander
0
Count White
0
Count More than one race
0
Count Unknown race
0
Percent female
92.45
Percent Male
7.55
Percent Any postsecondary education
22.00
Percent No high school diploma or GED
35.75
Percent With a high school diploma or GED
64.25
Percent Parents
100.00
Percent Single Parents
100.00
Percent Employed
23.00
Group formation formatted

Single parents who applied for IA in British Columbia between February 1994 and February 1995 had the opportunity to participate in the study. After participants gave consent and completed a baseline survey, evaluators randomly assigned 3,316 people to either the intervention group or the comparison group, with a 50 percent chance of assignment to each condition. All study participants were eligible to participate in follow-up surveys conducted 12, 30, 48, and 72 months after random assignment.

Study timing formatted

Random assignment for the applicant study occurred from February 1994 through March 1995. Individuals were followed for seven years.

Study funding formatted

The study was funded by a contract with Human Resources Development Canada.

Sample Characteristics

More than 90 percent of sample members were female. At the time the study began, more than 95 percent reported that they had held a paid position in the past, but fewer than one-quarter had worked in the month before random assignment. More than 35 percent had less than a high school education. At the start of the study, participants had, on average, between 1 and 2 children, and had received IA for about three months in the past two years. The authors noted that the IA system in British Columbia includes people with disabilities who were not able to work. In the United States, similar recipients would be Supplemental Security Income clients, and not Temporary Assistance for Needy Families clients.

Implementing organization formatted

Social Research and Demonstration Corporation

Program history

Researchers designed the program for this demonstration study.

Treatment condition formatted

The SSP offered financial incentives to work by providing an earnings supplement to eligible IA applicants in British Columbia. Single parents who started a new IA spell and who were randomly assigned to the intervention group were eligible to receive the SSP earnings supplements if they stayed on IA for a full year and then found full-time work and left IA. Upon leaving IA, individuals could sign up to receive an earnings supplement in the amount of half of the difference between their earnings from full-time work and a benchmark level, which was set each year. The supplement amount was not affected by unearned income, such as child support, and it roughly doubled the earnings of many low-wage workers. The earnings supplement was voluntary and lasted up to three years as long as participants continued to meet eligibility requirements.

Comparison condition formatted

People in the comparison group were IA clients who were not eligible to receive any SSP earnings supplements.

Mandatory services formatted

None.

Timing of study formatted

Individuals could receive SSP payments for up to three years.

Program funding formatted

Human Resources Development Canada.

Setting details formatted

British Columbia, Canada

Delivered by public or private entity?
Private
Secondary domains examined

Couple relationships, Housing, Financial assets, Parenting and co-parenting, Family formation, Child well-being

Earliest publication year
1999
Most recent publication year
2003
Manuscripts
Check edits flag
No
Primary Service
Financial incentives
Enrollment Period
February 1994 to March 1995
Intervention Duration
36.00
Subgroup data - Hispanic
No
Intervention Cost
$6931
Comparison cost
$1178