Submitted by user on
Study Name
Georgia Fatherhood Program
Study Sharepoint ID
0171
Evaluation name
Georgia Fatherhood Program
Intervention name from study report
Georgia Fatherhood Program
Intervention (standard name)
Strength of Evidence Tag
Reason for the Rating

This study received a low study quality rating because the intervention was always provided in combination with another factor and the effect of the intervention cannot be disentangled from the effect of that other factor.

This study received a low study quality rating because the intervention was always provided in combination with another factor and the effect of the intervention cannot be disentangled from the effect of that other factor.

Populations targeted
Settings in which the intervention was studied
Percent Male
100.00
Percent Non-Custodial Parents
100.00
Percent general low-income population
100.00
Group formation formatted

The authors surveyed fathers participating in the Georgia Fatherhood Program before they began program orientation. The study team recruited nonparticipants—who were noncustodial parents required to pay child support—from child support enforcement offices or courthouses and offered them $10 to complete an initial survey.

To collect post-test data, the authors contacted the participants and nonparticipants who had completed the initial survey, offering a $25 incentive for survey completion.

Study timing formatted

Pre-intervention data were collected from August through December 1999 and post-intervention data were collected from January through June 2000.

Implementing organization formatted

The Georgia Fatherhood Program

Treatment condition formatted

Noncustodial parents who have a child support order or child support arrearage, lack high school educational credentials, are unemployed or underemployed, or are referred by their child support agent are eligible to participate in the Georgia Fatherhood Program. The program provides job placement and training in life skills and in occupations like truck driving and heating or air conditioning repair.

Comparison condition formatted

Members of the comparison group were noncustodial parents subject to a child support order. They received no employment training or job placement.

Mandatory services formatted

None.

Earliest publication year
2003
Most recent publication year
2003
Manuscripts
Check edits flag
No