Submitted by user on
Study Name
Minnesota Subsidized and Transitional Employment Demonstration (MSTED)
Study Sharepoint ID
26587
Evaluation name
The Minnesota Subsidized and Transitional Employment Demonstration (MSTED) Evaluation
Strength of Evidence Tag
Reason for the Rating

This study received a high study quality rating because it is a low-attrition randomized controlled trial with no known issues that suggest the findings cannot be attributed to the intervention.

This study received a high study quality rating because it is a low-attrition randomized controlled trial with no known issues that suggest the findings cannot be attributed to the intervention.

Settings in which the intervention was studied
Characteristics

Subgroups

Subgroup data - Female
No
Subgroup data - Male
No
Subgroup data - White
No
Subgroup data - Black
No
Count age
799
Count Young Adults
0
Count Hard-to-employ
0
Count Disability
0
Count chronically ill
0
Count mentally ill
0
Count substance dependent
0
Count formerly incarcerated
0
Count Justice involved
0
Count limited work history
0
Count homeless
0
Count immigrants
0
Count refugees
0
Count veterans
0
Count female
0
Count Male
0
Count Any postsecondary education
0
Count With a high school diploma or GED
0
Count No high school diploma or GED
0
Count Married
0
Count Parents
0
Count Single Parents
0
Count Non-Custodial Parents
0
Count Employed
0
Count Self employed
0
Count Unemployed
0
Count Disconnected/discouraged workers
0
Count general low-income population
0
Count Very low income (as classified by the authors)
0
Count welfare population
0
Count long-term welfare recipients
0
Count Asian
0
Count Black or African American
0
Count Hispanic or Latino of any race
0
Count American Indian or Alaska Native
0
Count Pacific islander
0
Count White
0
Count More than one race
0
Count Unknown race
0
Count another race
0
Percent Disability
7.70
Percent fomerly incarcerated
35.20
Percent homeless
4.10
Percent immigrants
13.20
Percent female
81.30
Percent Male
18.70
Percent Any postsecondary education
55.70
Percent No high school diploma or GED
26.90
Percent With a high school diploma or GED
73.10
Percent Married
11.30
Percent general low-income population
100.00
Percent Black or African American
65.30
Percent Hispanic or Latino of any race
6.60
Percent White not Hispanic
15.80
Percent More than one race
7.80
Percent another race
4.50
Mean age
30.60
Group formation formatted

The Minnesota Family Investment Program (MFIP)—which was the state's Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) program—referred 1,250 participants in Ramsey, Dakota, and Hennepin Counties to MSTED providers. MSTED staff provided each referred individual with information on the program and on the study. MSTED providers enrolled a total of 799 individuals who agreed to participate. MSTED providers then randomly assigned each individual into either the intervention group (403) or the comparison group (396). Sample enrollment and random assignment took place from November 2014 to June 2016.

Study timing formatted

MSTED enrolled participants from November 2014 to June 2016. The study includes two follow-ups that occurred 12 months (the manuscript reviewed here) and 30 months (to be discussed in a future publication) after random assignment, respectively.

Study funding formatted

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children and Families, Office of Planning, Research, and Evaluation funded the evaluation under the Subsidized and Transitional Employment Demonstration, 2010–2020.

Sample Characteristics

All individuals in the sample were recipients of MFIP cash assistance in one of the three participating counties. The average participant was 30 years old, female (81 percent), and head of a single-parent household (84 percent). Almost two-thirds of participants were Black, and almost 16 percent were White. Ten percent reported having limited English skills, 36 percent had ever been convicted of a crime, and 11 percent reported caring for someone with a disability.

Implementing organization formatted

Three nonprofit service providers (HIRED, Avivo, and Goodwill-Easter Seals) implemented the MSTED program across three counties.

Program history

Minnesota had funded subsidized employment programs since 2007, but the MSTED program was new.

Treatment condition formatted

Individuals assigned to the intervention group were participants in Minnesota's TANF program, called the MFIP, who were given access to MSTED services and subsidized employment. MSTED services included working with a job developer to assess job readiness; workshops and one-on-one training to support job readiness as needed; and assistance finding subsidized employment. The MSTED model included two subsidized employment options: (1) paid work experience at a public agency or nonprofit organization, during which participants improved their workplace skills and earned fully subsidized wages of $9 per hour for up to 24 hours per week for 8 weeks; or (2) a subsidized job with a private employer during which individuals could earn subsidized wages of up to $15 per hour for up to 40 hours per week. Wages were fully subsidized for the first 8 weeks, and the subsidy was reduced to 50 percent for an additional 8 weeks. The option of a subsidized job with a private employer was intended for participants deemed more job-ready by MSTED staff. All members of the intervention group also had access to MFIP employment services.

Comparison condition formatted

Individuals assigned to the comparison group were participants in Minnesota's TANF program, called the MFIP, who were not given access to MSTED services. Comparison group participants had access to MFIP employment services, which included structured job-readiness classes, independent job search, uncompensated work experience, community service, English as a second language training, and education services (postsecondary education or training, adult basic education, and high school completion or GED classes).

Mandatory services formatted

None

Timing of study formatted

MSTED participants in paid work experience received fully subsidized wages for up to 8 weeks. Subsidized jobs participants received fully subsidized wages for 8 weeks, and then the subsidy was reduced to 50 percent for an additional 8 weeks.

Program funding formatted

The Minnesota Department of Human Services funded the program with state funds.

Setting details formatted

This study took place in Ramsey, Dakota, and Hennepin Counties in Minnesota; these are the three most populated counties in Minnesota. One or two nonprofit service providers in each county delivered services to participants.

Delivered by public or private entity?
Private
Secondary domains examined

Self-reported economic and personal well-being

Earliest publication year
2019
Most recent publication year
2019
Check edits flag
No
Primary Service
Subsidized employment
Enrollment Period
November 2014 to June 2016
Intervention Duration
5.50
Subgroup data - Hispanic
No
Intervention Cost
$14013
Comparison cost
$9073