Submitted by user on
Study Name
St. Nick's Alliance WorkAdvance Program
Study Sharepoint ID
6762.02
Evaluation name
WorkAdvance Demonstration
Percent fomerly incarcerated
18.20
Percent Justice involved
19.90
Percent female
14.50
Percent Male
85.50
Percent Any postsecondary education
43.50
Percent No high school diploma or GED
11.90
Percent With a high school diploma or GED
88.10
Percent Married
18.30
Percent Parents
45.30
Percent Employed
10.50
Percent Unemployed
89.40
Percent welfare population
13.70
Percent general low-income population
100.00
Percent Black or African American
62.70
Percent Hispanic or Latino of any race
22.80
Percent White not Hispanic
6.90
Percent another race
7.50
Mean age
35.00
Group formation formatted

WorkAdvance focused on recruiting individuals ages 18 or older who were legally allowed to work in the United States, had a monthly family income less than 200 percent of the federal poverty level, and earned less than $15 per hour, if employed. Individuals were enrolled in the study after completing an intensive screening process lasting up to seven days, with requirements varying at each site. After being deemed eligible for WorkAdvance, individuals completed consent forms, provided baseline information, and were randomly assigned to the WorkAdvance group or the comparison group. Random assignment occurred from June 2011 to June 2013. This study considers the effect of the St. Nicks Alliance WorkAdvance Program, one of four programs implementing the WorkAdvance model within the WorkAdvance Demonstration. Other studies reviewed separately in the Pathways Clearinghouse consider the effects of the other three programs. The study authors also reported on the effects of WorkAdvance using a pooled sample of participants from across all four programs. The Pathways Clearinghouse did not consider results for the pooled sample because the study authors indicated these results were exploratory.

Study timing formatted

Individuals were randomly assigned from June 2011 to June 2013 and followed through the end of 2018.

Study funding formatted

The Social Innovation Fund, Corporation for National and Community Service, funded the study.

Sample Characteristics

The majority of study participants were male (86 percent) and single (82 percent), and the average age was 35. Sixty-three percent of participants were Black or African American, 7 percent were non-Hispanic White, and 23 percent were Hispanic or Latino. Almost all participants had a GED certificate/high school diploma or some postsecondary education (45 percent and 44 percent, respectively). About 20 percent of participants had been previously convicted of a crime. Eleven percent were currently employed, 42 percent received Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program benefits, and 25 percent received unemployment insurance benefits.

Implementing organization formatted

St. Nicks Alliance, a New York City social services organization.

Program history

WorkAdvance was launched in 2011 and did not exist before this study. However, St. Nicks Alliance had been in operation since 1975.

Treatment condition formatted

The WorkAdvance program uses a dual-customer approach to provide training and employment services meeting the needs of low-skilled workers and local employers. The WorkAdvance model includes five key elements: (1) intensive screening before enrollment; (2) pre-employment and work-readiness services, including career coaching, supportive services, and labor market information, all tailored to a specific vocational sector; (3) occupational skills training focused on current job openings; (4) job development and placement; and (5) provision of follow-up retention services in collaboration with employers. Four sites implemented the WorkAdvance model for this demonstration, with each choosing one or more occupations of focus and implementing the model in a different way. In particular, the length, breadth, and depth of many services differed. This review focuses on the St. Nicks Alliance site, a New York City social services agency that implemented the WorkAdvance model with an emphasis on the environmental remediation and pest control sectors, and with a training-first approach in which participants receive occupational skills training before seeking employment. Pre-employment services were delivered in 9 sessions of 4 hours each, and occupational skills training lasted 5 to 12 weeks.

Comparison condition formatted

Individuals in the comparison group completed the WorkAdvance screening but could not receive other WorkAdvance services. They remained eligible for other services in their communities.

Mandatory services formatted

None

Timing of study formatted

Pre-employment services were delivered in 9 sessions of 4 hours each, and the occupational skills training lasted 5 to 12 weeks. Follow-up services were provided weekly during the first 30 days of a participant's employment, and coaches followed up monthly with participants thereafter, with no duration specified.

Program funding formatted

A Social Innovation Fund grant to the Mayor's Fund to Advance New York City and the Center for Economic Opportunity funded WorkAdvance. Matching funds for WorkAdvance were provided by Bloomberg Philanthropies, Open Society Foundations, The Rockefeller Foundation, Altman Foundation, Common Bond Foundation, Ford Foundation, The Fund for Our Economic Future, George Kaiser Family Foundation, The Ira W. DeCamp Foundation, JPMorgan Chase Foundation, The Kresge Foundation, Robin Hood Foundation, Surdna Foundation, Tiger Foundation, Tulsa Area United Way, Tulsa Community Foundation, and The Harry and Jeanette Weinberg Foundation, Inc.

Setting details formatted

The study took place at the St. Nicks Alliance site in Brooklyn, NY.

Delivered by public or private entity?
Private
Secondary domains examined

Job characteristics; life satisfaction; financial hardship; family formation; health insurance; housing

Earliest publication year
2013
Most recent publication year
2020
Check edits flag
No
Primary Service
Occupational or sectoral training
Enrollment Period
June 2011 to June 2013
Intervention Duration
2.50
Intervention Cost
$8054
Comparison cost
$1913