ModerateStudy design
Design:
Study group formation:
Time period of study:
Primary outcome domains examined:
Increase short-term earnings, Increase long-term earnings, Increase education and trainingStudy funded by:
Results
Scroll to the right to view the rest of the table columns
| Outcome domain | Measure | Timing | Study quality by finding | Impact | Units | Findings | Sample size |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Increase short-term earnings | Quarterly earnings | Q6 |
Moderate
|
517.87 | 2019 dollars |
|
3,266 |
| Increase long-term earnings | Quarterly earnings | Q9 |
Moderate
|
746.00 | 2019 dollars |
|
3,266 |
| Increase education and training | Number of AAS degrees earned |
Moderate
|
0.02 | count |
|
3,266 | |
| Increase education and training | Number of technical certificates earned |
Moderate
|
0.06 | count |
|
3,266 | |
| Increase education and training | Number of vocational certificates earned |
Moderate
|
0.15 | count |
|
3,266 |
High
Moderate
The findings quality describe our confidence that a given study’s finding is because of the intervention. We do not display findings that rate low.
A moderate-to-large favorable finding that is unlikely to be due to chance
A moderate-to-large favorable finding that might to be due to chance
A small favorable finding that is unlikely to be due to chance
A small favorable finding that might be due to chance
A favorable finding that is unlikely to be due to chance, but we cannot determine the standardized effect size
A favorable finding that might be due to chance, but we cannot determine the standardized effect size
A moderate-to-large unfavorable finding that is unlikely to be due to chance
A moderate-to-large unfavorable finding that might to be due to chance
A small unfavorable finding that is unlikely to be due to chance
A small unfavorable finding that might be due to chance
An unfavorable finding that is unlikely to be due to chance, but we cannot determine the standardized effect size
An unfavorable finding that might be due to chance, but we cannot determine the standardized effect size
A finding that is unlikely to be due to chance, but we cannot determine the standardized effect size or direction
A finding of no effect that might be due to chance
Sample characteristics
The study sample was primarily adults without a high school diploma or GED.
Age
| Mean age | 26 years |
Sex
| Female | 54% |
| Male | 46% |
Participant race and ethnicity
| Black or African American |
42%
|
| White, not Hispanic |
50%
|
| Hispanic or Latino of any race |
2%
|
| American Indian or Alaska Native |
2%
|
| More than one race |
2%
|
| Unknown, not reported, or other |
3%
|
The race and ethnicity categories may sum to more than 100 percent if the authors reported race and ethnicity separately; in these cases, we report the category White, rather than White, not Hispanic.
Participant education
| Had a high school diploma or GED | 9% |
| Did not have a high school diploma or GED | 91% |
Intervention implementation
Implementing organization:
Program history:
Intervention services:
Mandatory services:
Comparison services:
Service receipt duration:
Intervention funding:
Study publications
Briggs, Amanda, Daniel Kuehn, Nathan Sick, Christin Durham, Theresa Anderson, and Semhar Gebrekristos (2022). Findings from the Mississippi Integrated Basic Education and Skills Training Program. Urban Institute. Available at: https://www.urban.org/sites/default/files/2022-09/Findings%20from%20the%20Mississippi%20Integrated%20Basic%20Education%20and%20Skills%20Training%20Program.pdf
View the glossary for more information about these and other terms used on this page.
The Pathways Clearinghouse refers to interventions by the names used in study reports or manuscripts. Some intervention names may use language that is not consistent with our style guide, preferences, or the terminology we use to describe populations.
101011-Study of Mississippi