Submitted by user on
Study Name
TransitionsSF
Study Sharepoint ID
24963.03
Evaluation name
Enhanced Transitional Jobs Demonstration (ETJD)
Count age
0
Count Young Adults
0
Count Hard-to-employ
0
Count Disability
0
Count chronically ill
0
Count mentally ill
0
Count substance dependent
0
Count formerly incarcerated
0
Count Justice involved
0
Count limited work history
0
Count homeless
0
Count immigrants
0
Count refugees
0
Count veterans
0
Count female
0
Count Male
0
Count Any postsecondary education
0
Count With a high school diploma or GED
0
Count No high school diploma or GED
0
Count Married
0
Count Parents
0
Count Single Parents
0
Count Non-Custodial Parents
0
Count Employed
0
Count Self employed
0
Count Unemployed
0
Count Disconnected/discouraged workers
0
Count general low-income population
0
Count Very low income (as classified by the authors)
0
Count welfare population
0
Count long-term welfare recipients
0
Count Asian
0
Count Black or African American
0
Count Hispanic or Latino of any race
0
Count American Indian or Alaska Native
0
Count Pacific islander
0
Count White
0
Count More than one race
0
Count Unknown race
0
Percent Disability
0.20
Percent fomerly incarcerated
28.30
Percent homeless
13.70
Percent veterans
0.90
Percent female
12.00
Percent Male
88.00
Percent Any postsecondary education
3.90
Percent No high school diploma or GED
28.50
Percent With a high school diploma or GED
71.50
Percent Married
8.40
Percent Parents
100.00
Percent Non-Custodial Parents
100.00
Percent Black or African American
67.50
Percent Hispanic or Latino of any race
19.40
Percent White not Hispanic
3.30
Percent another race
9.80
Mean age
40.10
Group formation formatted

The Division of Child Support Services (DCSS) identified and invited a sample of eligible individuals from their database each month. Individuals were eligible if they were a noncustodial parent between the ages of 18 and 60; were living in San Francisco; were either unemployed or underemployed; and were behind in child support payments by 121 or more days, had made child support payments of less than $100 in the past 120 days, had zero or reserved orders because of low income, or were required to have child support orders established within 30 days. To reach their target recruitment number, DCSS staff reached out to custodial parents for help contacting noncustodial parents and also advertised the program in the community, including in halfway houses, jails, and community centers. Interested individuals attended an orientation at a public library and, if they agreed to participate, attended a random assignment appointment two days later where they were randomly assigned to either the TransitionsSF program or a comparison group. A total of 995 people were randomly assigned to either the intervention group (502) or the comparison group (493).

Study timing formatted

Evaluators randomly assigned people into groups for the study between November 2011 and December 2013. The study reports impacts up to 30 months after random assignment.

Study funding formatted

Employment and Training Administration in the U.S. Department of Labor and ACF

Sample Characteristics

The study examined unemployed or underemployed noncustodial parents. The majority of participants were male (88 percent). Sixty-seven percent were Black; the average age was 40 years. At the time the study began, 8 percent were married, 28 percent had formerly been incarcerated, 14 percent were homeless, and 29 percent did not have a high school diploma.

Implementing organization formatted

Goodwill Industries and the San Francisco Department of Child Support Services

Program history

The program is based on a subsidized employment program that the city's Human Services Agency funded through the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act.

Treatment condition formatted

The TransitionsSF program served unemployed and underemployed noncustodial parents. The program included three phases. The first, which typically lasted three weeks, was a pre-transitional job period, during which participants took assessments to determine whether they needed substance abuse services, mental health services, or other services. If participants needed such services, case managers made appropriate referrals. During this time, participants also received job-readiness training to help them develop their soft skills. In the second phase, participants were placed in subsidized transitional jobs for five months. Participants were placed at a nonprofit (Goodwill), in the public sector, or in the private sector, depending on their readiness. Near the end of the transitional job, participants received job search assistance. In the third phase, staff assisted participants for one year with job searching if the participant had not found a job, or with retention and advancement if they had found a job. During each phase, participants received case management services. As an incentive to continue participation in the program, participants had suspended driver's licenses reinstated, and their child support payments were reduced while they continued participating in the program.

Comparison condition formatted

Comparison group members could participate in other programs, including DCSS's Custodial and Noncustodial Employment Training Program.

Mandatory services formatted

None.

Timing of study formatted

The pre-transitional jobs period lasted three weeks; participants were then placed in transitional jobs for five months. Participants received support for one year after the transitional job ended. In total, participants received services for about a year and a half.

Program funding formatted

Employment and Training Administration, U.S. Department of Labor

Setting details formatted

The program took place in San Francisco, CA.

Secondary domains examined

Child support and family relations, Material hardship, Criminal justice, Economic and personal well-being

Earliest publication year
0
Most recent publication year
0
Check edits flag
No
Primary Service
Transitional jobs
Enrollment Period
November 2011 to December 2013
Intervention Duration
18.00
Intervention Cost
$10702
Comparison cost
$1904