Submitted by user on
Study Name
Reach for Success
Study Sharepoint ID
3135
Evaluation name
Employment Retention and Advancement (ERA) Project
Characteristics

Subgroups

Subgroup data - Female
No
Subgroup data - Male
No
Subgroup data - White
No
Subgroup data - Black
No
Count age
0
Count Young Adults
0
Count Hard-to-employ
0
Count Disability
0
Count chronically ill
0
Count mentally ill
0
Count substance dependent
0
Count formerly incarcerated
0
Count Justice involved
0
Count limited work history
0
Count homeless
0
Count immigrants
0
Count refugees
0
Count veterans
0
Count female
0
Count Male
0
Count Any postsecondary education
0
Count With a high school diploma or GED
0
Count No high school diploma or GED
0
Count Married
0
Count Parents
0
Count Single Parents
0
Count Non-Custodial Parents
0
Count Employed
0
Count Self employed
0
Count Unemployed
0
Count Disconnected/discouraged workers
0
Count general low-income population
0
Count Very low income (as classified by the authors)
0
Count welfare population
0
Count long-term welfare recipients
0
Count Asian
0
Count Black or African American
0
Count Hispanic or Latino of any race
0
Count American Indian or Alaska Native
0
Count Pacific islander
0
Count White
0
Count More than one race
0
Count Unknown race
0
Percent female
94.40
Percent Male
5.60
Percent Any postsecondary education
3.90
Percent No high school diploma or GED
50.20
Percent With a high school diploma or GED
49.80
Percent Parents
100.00
Percent Single Parents
100.00
Percent Employed
100.00
Percent welfare population
100.00
Percent Black or African American
51.00
Percent Hispanic or Latino of any race
40.40
Percent White not Hispanic
5.20
Percent another race
3.50
Mean age
30.90
Group formation formatted

Individuals were eligible for the study if they were single-parent Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) recipients, resided in specific parts of Los Angeles County (including areas in the western part of Los Angeles County, south-central Los Angeles, east Los Angeles, and the neighborhoods surrounding Los Angeles International Airport), and were working 32 or more hours per week. From the end of July 2002 to June 2004, evaluators identified and randomly assigned 5,412 individuals, half to the Reach For Success group and half to the post-employment services (PES) group. The evaluation included surveys 12 and 42 months after random assignment. Evaluators used a two-stage process to identify individuals to survey. First, they restricted the group to sample members who were randomly assigned from July to December 2003 (12-month survey only), spoke English or Spanish, and were age 18 or older at the time of random assignment. Then, evaluators randomly selected a subset of the survey-eligible group and contacted these people.

Study timing formatted

Random assignment was conducted from the end of July 2002 through June 2004. Evaluators followed people in the study for 42 months after random assignment.

Study funding formatted

The Office of Planning, Research, and Evaluation in ACF at the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services funded the study, with support from the U.S. Department of Labor.

Sample Characteristics

All participants were employed, single-parent TANF recipients. About half of the participants were Black, 40 percent were Hispanic, and 94 percent were female. The average age was 31, and the average number of children was two. About one-third of the sample had received Aid to Families with Dependent Children or TANF for three or more years as of study entry, and half of the sample did not have a high school diploma or equivalent certificate. Most spoke English, although 13 percent spoke Spanish as their primary language.

Implementing organization formatted

Los Angeles County TANF offices

Program history

The program was a pilot that operated from March 2002 to June 2005.

Treatment condition formatted

The Reach for Success program sought to help participants retain employment and secure better jobs through customized services, flexibility, and individualized attention. Specifically, retention services focused on helping clients access work supports (for example, child care and transportation) and more effectively negotiate work-related issues through the development of soft skills (that is, interpersonal and communication skills). Career advancement services were more tailored to clients' needs and their levels of motivation. In addition, case managers worked with smaller caseloads and provided coaching and assistance to individuals to advance in their careers through education, training, and work-based approaches.

Comparison condition formatted

The comparison group received the existing PES program. Individuals received less individualized and more rule-bound PES. Clients received very few job retention services other than standard work supports. Career advancement services consisted primarily of support for education and training and were available only upon clients' requests.

Mandatory services formatted

None.

Timing of study formatted

Participants could receive services for up to one year if they remained on TANF.

Program funding formatted

Los Angeles County; California TANF

Setting details formatted

Evaluators conducted the study in three regions of the Los Angeles County Greater Avenues for Independence program: Region 1 (western Los Angeles County and neighborhoods surrounding Los Angeles International Airport), Region 5 (including south-central Los Angeles), and Region 6 (including east Los Angeles).

Delivered by public or private entity?
Public
Secondary domains examined

Mental health, Substance abuse

Earliest publication year
0
Most recent publication year
0
Manuscripts
Check edits flag
No
Primary Service
Case management
Enrollment Period
July 2002 to June 2004
Intervention Duration
12.00
Subgroup data - Hispanic
No