Submitted by user on
Study Name
Welfare Restructuring Project (WRP) (as compared with WRP Incentives Only)—Two-Parent Households Including an Incapacitated Parent
Study Sharepoint ID
3172.3172.07
Evaluation name
Welfare Restructuring Program (WRP)

Subgroups

Subgroup data - Female
No
Subgroup data - Male
No
Subgroup data - White
No
Subgroup data - Black
No
Count age
0
Count Young Adults
0
Count Hard-to-employ
0
Count Disability
0
Count chronically ill
0
Count mentally ill
0
Count substance dependent
0
Count formerly incarcerated
0
Count Justice involved
0
Count limited work history
0
Count homeless
0
Count immigrants
0
Count refugees
0
Count veterans
0
Count female
0
Count Male
0
Count Any postsecondary education
0
Count With a high school diploma or GED
0
Count No high school diploma or GED
0
Count Married
0
Count Parents
570
Count Single Parents
0
Count Non-Custodial Parents
0
Count Employed
0
Count Self employed
0
Count Unemployed
0
Count Disconnected/discouraged workers
0
Count general low-income population
0
Count Very low income (as classified by the authors)
0
Count welfare population
0
Count long-term welfare recipients
0
Count Asian
0
Count Black or African American
0
Count Hispanic or Latino of any race
0
Count American Indian or Alaska Native
0
Count Pacific islander
0
Count White
0
Count More than one race
0
Count Unknown race
0
Percent Married
91.00
Percent Parents
100.00
Percent welfare population
100.00
Group formation formatted

Between July 1994 and December 1996, evaluators randomly assigned applicants for welfare cash assistance in Vermont to one of three groups: the WRP group (60 percent), the WRP Incentives Only group (20 percent), and the Aid to Needy Families with Children (ANFC) group (20 percent). Those already receiving welfare payments during that period were also eligible for the program and were randomly assigned to one of the three conditions at their semiannual eligibility review. Nearly all households applying for or already receiving cash assistance were eligible for random assignment; after 30 months, staff determined that some clients were exempt from the WRP work requirement. Some analyses were conducted using a full statewide sample, whereas others focused on individuals in 6 of Vermont's 12 districts (termed the research districts). This review considers only the comparison of the WRP group with the WRP Incentives Only group for two-parent households including an incapacitated parent. Other reviews on this site examine the ANFC group (compared with WRP or the WRP Incentives Only group) or examine the experiences of other types of households.

Study timing formatted

Applicants were randomly assigned between July 1994 and December 1996 and were followed for six years after random assignment.

Study funding formatted

The state of Vermont, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, and the Ford Foundation funded the evaluation of the program.

Sample Characteristics

All participants were in two-parent families in which one parent was incapacitated. For the six research districts, 87 percent of the overall sample was married and living with a spouse.   Sixty-three percent of the overall sample had no earnings for the 12 months before random assignment for the able-bodied parent. Thirty percent of the overall sample had a child younger than 3.

Implementing organization formatted

Vermont state ANFC (state Aid to Families with Dependent Children agency)

Program history

The program began under a waiver from federal welfare laws before passage of the federal Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act. The Vermont state legislature approved the program in January 1994, and the program and the study both began in July 1994.

Treatment condition formatted

The WRP required that the able-bodied parent from a two-parent family with one disabled parent work in a wage-paying job after receiving cash assistance for 30 cumulative months. (Parents of children younger than 13 were required to work only half-time.) Before reaching the 30-month time limit, parents prepared for and attempted to obtain unsubsidized employment. Five months before reaching the time limit, parents who were not already participating in Reach Up (Vermont's voluntary welfare-to-work program) were assigned to a case manager. The case manager assessed their work readiness, prepared an employment plan, and encouraged them to enroll in education or training. Parents who remained unemployed 2 months before the 30-month time limit were required to participate in job search activities that included job-search classes (one or two per week) and meetings with a case manager. If, after those 2 months, parents did not secure a job, they were placed in subsidized, minimum-wage community service employment, but could engage in education or training activities at any time by enrolling in the full Reach Up program. The program also included incentives to encourage and reward work, such as offering up to three years of Medicaid coverage and transitional child care assistance for parents who transitioned from welfare to work, and increasing the amount of earnings disregarded when determining the welfare benefit level. The state also waived some nonfinancial eligibility requirements for welfare for two-parent families. If a parent did not adhere to the work requirement, the state used the parent’s cash assistance grant to pay the household’s bills and required the parent to attend three meetings a month at the welfare office. Parents had to meet these new requirements for the state to restore their cash assistance.

Comparison condition formatted

The comparison group, referred to as the WRP Incentives Only group, received the same financial incentives for work as the WRP group but did not face the work requirement.

Mandatory services formatted

Participants were mandated to complete a work requirement. If they failed to comply, the state of Vermont would take control of their cash assistance, and participants would be mandated to attend three meetings per month. Participants would lose their benefits if they failed to attend the meetings.

Timing of study formatted

There was no limit on participants' receipt of cash assistance. Those in the WRP group were required to have the able-bodied parent working after receiving cash assistance for 30 months. Those who did not meet the work requirement could still receive cash assistance, but the state took control of the grant to pay participants' bills.

Program funding formatted

Vermont Department of Social Welfare (later called the Department of Prevention, Assistance, Transition, and Health Access).

Setting details formatted

The study took place in all 12 districts of Vermont. The study primarily focused on 6 districts, known as the research sample: Burlington, Barre, Newport, Rutland, St. Albans, and Springfield. These districts vary from Vermont's largest city to more rural settings. The Department of Social Welfare administered the program, and the Department of Employment and Training administered the Reach Up program and organized the community service employment positions.

Delivered by public or private entity?
Public
Secondary domains examined

None

Earliest publication year
1998
Most recent publication year
2002
Manuscripts
Check edits flag
No
Primary Service
Work experience
Enrollment Period
July 1994 to December 1996
Subgroup data - Hispanic
No