Intervention description

VIP eligibility provisions included the following: (1) one-time payments to families with a temporary loss of income if they agreed to forgo AFDC/TANF receipt for 160 days; (2) a “family cap” that excluded children born more than 10 months after a family began to receive AFDC/TANF from a family’s benefit calculation; (3) an exemption for the accumulation of savings up to $5,000 to support education, entrepreneurship, or the purchase of a home; (4) the application of one-parent eligibility criteria in determining benefits for two-parent families; and (5) requirements for paternity establishment cooperation, child school attendance, and immunization, and a requirement that minor parents live with a parent or other eligible adult. In addition to VIP, participants were required to participate in VIEW. VIEW emphasized rapid reemployment, requiring individuals to sign an agreement of personal responsibility, begin job searching immediately, and obtain employment or participate in a community work experience program within 90 days of signing the agreement of personal responsibility. Finally, VIEW instituted a two-year time limit on cash assistance and tightened medical exemptions from AFDC/TANF work requirements. VIP with VIEW served AFDC/TANF recipients. VIP with VIEW was implemented in Lynchburg, Petersburg, and Prince William County in Virginia. This evaluation also studied the impacts of VIP Only (that is, VIP without VIEW).

Year evaluation began
1995
State & Region
Short intervention description

VIP with VIEW changed the eligibility requirements for Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC)/Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) and emphasized rapid reemployment, paternity establishment and economic self-sufficiency.

Count well supported or supported domains
2
Count Well supported domains
0
Count supported domains
2
Count not supported
2
Count domains examined
6
Count domains not examined
4
has evidence
Off
Covid-19 Impact
No
Characteristics
Percent another race
0.00
Percent Asian
0.00
Percent Black or African American
63.00
Percent Hispanic or Latino of any race
3.00
Percent American Indian or Alaska Native
0.00
Percent Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0.00
Percent Pacific islander
0.00
Percent White
0.00
Percent White not Hispanic
0.00
Percent More than one race
0.00
Percent unknown race
0.00
Percent Unknown or not reported
34.00
Intervention Primary Service
Populations targeted