Submitted by user on
Study Name
Design It-Build It-Ship It (DBS)
Study Sharepoint ID
28396
Evaluation name
Final Evaluation of Design It-Build It-Ship It
Intervention (standard name)
Strength of Evidence Tag
Reason for the Rating

This study received a low study quality rating because it is a quasi-experimental design that does not demonstrate that the intervention and comparison groups were sufficiently similar before the intervention.

This study received a low study quality rating because it is a quasi-experimental design that does not demonstrate that the intervention and comparison groups were sufficiently similar before the intervention.

Settings in which the intervention was studied

Subgroups

Subgroup data - Female
No
Subgroup data - Male
No
Subgroup data - White
No
Subgroup data - Black
No
Count age
0
Count Young Adults
2583
Count Hard-to-employ
0
Count Disability
0
Count chronically ill
229
Count mentally ill
0
Count substance dependent
0
Count formerly incarcerated
0
Count Justice involved
0
Count limited work history
0
Count homeless
0
Count immigrants
0
Count refugees
265
Count veterans
463
Count female
1948
Count Male
621
Count Any postsecondary education
97
Count With a high school diploma or GED
1855
Count No high school diploma or GED
1027
Count Married
0
Count Parents
0
Count Single Parents
0
Count Non-Custodial Parents
0
Count Employed
1695
Count Self employed
535
Count Unemployed
0
Count Disconnected/discouraged workers
0
Count general low-income population
0
Count Very low income (as classified by the authors)
0
Count welfare population
0
Count long-term welfare recipients
0
Count Asian
429
Count Black or African American
795
Count Hispanic or Latino of any race
0
Count American Indian or Alaska Native
0
Count Pacific islander
3522
Count White
1018
Count White not Hispanic
348
Count More than one race
0
Count Unknown race
0
Count another race
0
Percent Disability
7.30
Percent veterans
7.05
Percent Male
73.01
Percent Any postsecondary education
69.68
Percent No high school diploma or GED
2.62
Percent With a high school diploma or GED
27.71
Percent Parents
29.42
Percent Employed
52.25
Percent Unemployed
47.75
Percent Disconnected/discouraged workers
15.07
Percent welfare population
12.31
Percent general low-income population
51.60
Percent Asian
19.34
Percent Black or African American
13.36
Percent Hispanic or Latino of any race
24.76
Percent White not Hispanic
31.70
Percent More than one race
10.84
Mean age
28.20
Group formation formatted

The evaluation employed a quasi-experimental design to compare the outcomes of intervention participants with the outcomes of students in non-DBS-funded career training and technical education (CTE) courses. Students self-selected into DBS-funded and non-DBS-funded CTE courses at each study site. Comparison CTE courses at a given site were selected if they provided education and training on skills in comparable occupational sectors as that site's DBS-funded program, and if they served students who were expected to be demographically similar to intervention participants. Students were not further matched across intervention and comparison conditions within sites on observable characteristics.

Study timing formatted

The intervention was delivered from the spring 2013 semester through the spring 2016 semester. Participants were interviewed up to 12 months after study enrollment, and administrative data were examined up to 4 semesters (24 months) after study enrollment.

Implementing organization formatted

DBS and Contra Costa Community College District, with Los Medanos College as the lead agency.

Treatment condition formatted

The DBS intervention provided workforce development services to 2,516 students across 11 community college sites in the San Francisco Bay Area from 2013 to 2016. Intervention participants received a combination of site-specific services intended to better facilitate career pathways. Services common to all sites included enhanced student support services through case managers, basic academic skill development, student peer cohorts, and job search and placement assistance. Site-specific services varied based on the targeted job sector, as did the content of services the intervention provided. For instance, participants in DBS-funded transportation and logistics sites received boot-camp services to accelerate completion of vocational certificates in forklift operations with nontechnical training; these services helped participants build soft skills relevant to warehouse operations and project management. Similarly, participants in DBS-funded advanced manufacturing programs received more intensive training in software and machine technology. By contrast, those in colleges implementing biosciences programs received services that were more integrated with traditional coursework, including enhanced tutoring, subsidized lab equipment, and peer cohort supports.

Comparison condition formatted

Community college students in the non-experimental comparison group were selected based on their enrollment in qualitatively similar coursework in each of the 11 participating colleges. For instance, participants in the comparison condition from intervention sites that focused on advanced manufacturing might have self-enrolled in welding or automotive technology. Comparison group participants did not participate in the DBS-funded program at their site. A total of 1,321 students were selected for the comparison condition.

Mandatory services formatted

None

Program funding formatted

The U.S. Department of Labor Employment and Training Administration: Trade Adjustment Assistance Community College Career Training Initiative

Setting details formatted

Eleven community colleges in the Bay Area in California. Colleges included College of Alameda, Berkeley City College, Chabot College, Contra Costa College, Diablo Valley College, Laney College, Los Medanos College, Merrit College, Ohlone College, Solano Community College, and Las Positas College.

Delivered by public or private entity?
Public
Earliest publication year
0
Most recent publication year
0
Manuscripts
Check edits flag
No
Primary Service
Occupational or sectoral training
Subgroup data - Hispanic
No