Submitted by user on
Study Name
Fathers Advancing Community Together (FACT)
Study Sharepoint ID
90071
Intervention (standard name)
Strength of Evidence Tag
Reason for the Rating

This study received a low study quality rating because it is a quasi-experimental design that does not adjust estimated impacts for potentially important differences between the intervention and comparison groups.

This study received a low study quality rating because it is a quasi-experimental design that does not adjust estimated impacts for potentially important differences between the intervention and comparison groups.

Populations targeted
Settings in which the intervention was studied

Subgroups

Subgroup data - Female
No
Subgroup data - Male
No
Subgroup data - White
No
Subgroup data - Black
No
Count age
0
Count Young Adults
0
Count Hard-to-employ
0
Count Disability
0
Count chronically ill
0
Count mentally ill
0
Count substance dependent
0
Count formerly incarcerated
0
Count Justice involved
0
Count limited work history
0
Count homeless
0
Count immigrants
0
Count refugees
0
Count veterans
0
Count female
0
Count Male
0
Count Any postsecondary education
0
Count With a high school diploma or GED
0
Count No high school diploma or GED
0
Count Married
0
Count Parents
0
Count Single Parents
0
Count Non-Custodial Parents
0
Count Employed
0
Count Self employed
0
Count Unemployed
0
Count Disconnected/discouraged workers
0
Count general low-income population
0
Count Very low income (as classified by the authors)
0
Count welfare population
0
Count long-term welfare recipients
0
Count Asian
0
Count Black or African American
0
Count Hispanic or Latino of any race
0
Count American Indian or Alaska Native
0
Count Pacific islander
0
Count White
0
Count White not Hispanic
0
Count More than one race
0
Count Unknown race
0
Count another race
0
Percent female
37.90
Percent Male
62.10
Percent Parents
100.00
Percent Non-Custodial Parents
65.00
Percent Employed
43.20
Percent general low-income population
100.00
Percent Black or African American
66.30
Percent Hispanic or Latino of any race
16.50
Percent White not Hispanic
14.60
Percent another race
2.60
Mean age
39.00
Group formation formatted

The authors used a quasi-experimental design. Participants were recruited to participate in FACT through walk-ins, word-of-mouth referrals, recruitment at county shelters, and staff presentations at meetings for individuals who were recently incarcerated. Parents living in Contra Costa County (California) who had at least one minor child and had a low to moderate income were eligible for FACT services. Program staff referred prospective participants whom they deemed to be not a good fit for FACT to receive other services in the community. The intervention group was formed by identifying and including 379 FACT participants, who enrolled between July 2016 and September 2019 and had an open child support case at the time of enrollment. The comparison group was formed by drawing from Department of Child Support Services administrative data to find individuals who made up a matched comparison group based on age, sex, race, how many children they had, whether parents were custodial or noncustodial, number of days they had a Department of Child Support Services child support case open, and whether they ever had more than one child support case opened. The authors used a coarsened exact matching procedure in which they matched three comparison group members to every intervention group member, for a total of 927 parents in the comparison group and 209 parents in the intervention group.

Study timing formatted

Participants enrolled between July 2016 and September 2019. Authors examined outcomes for six months after enrollment.

Implementing organization formatted

Rubicon Programs

Treatment condition formatted

The Fathers Advancing Community Together (FACT) program provided services to parents with low incomes in Contra Costa County, CA. Program staff provided services intended to help participants enhance their financial mobility and obtain employment. Services included reviewing resumes, helping with job applications, and offering financial literacy workshops. Individuals were offered intensive case management focused on building transformational relationships and establishing an empowerment plan with individual goals. Program staff also provided workshops on healthy relationships, parenting, and economic stability. Participants could access subsidized employment or transitional employment, therapy sessions, and legal assistance. Participants could also receive supportive services such as transportation assistance, work clothing, and referrals to outside services such as housing assistance or health services.

Comparison condition formatted

Comparison group members were individuals who had an open child support case between January 2016 and September 2019 and who would have been eligible for FACT but did not participate in it.

Mandatory services formatted

None

Setting details formatted

The study took place in Contra Costa County, CA.

Delivered by public or private entity?
Private
Secondary domains examined

Child support modification; Child support payments

Earliest publication year
2020
Most recent publication year
2022
Manuscripts
Check edits flag
No
Primary Service
Case management
Subgroup data - Hispanic
No