Submitted by user on
Study Name
Jobs-First Greater Avenues for Independence (GAIN)—Single-parent households
Study Sharepoint ID
3183.3183.01
Evaluation name
Los Angeles Jobs-First Greater Avenues for Independence (GAIN) Evaluation
Characteristics

Subgroups

Subgroup data - Female
No
Subgroup data - Male
No
Subgroup data - White
No
Subgroup data - Black
No
Count age
0
Count Young Adults
0
Count Hard-to-employ
0
Count Disability
0
Count chronically ill
0
Count mentally ill
0
Count substance dependent
0
Count formerly incarcerated
0
Count Justice involved
0
Count limited work history
0
Count homeless
0
Count immigrants
0
Count refugees
0
Count veterans
0
Count female
0
Count Male
0
Count Any postsecondary education
0
Count With a high school diploma or GED
0
Count No high school diploma or GED
0
Count Married
0
Count Parents
0
Count Single Parents
0
Count Non-Custodial Parents
0
Count Employed
0
Count Self employed
0
Count Unemployed
0
Count Disconnected/discouraged workers
0
Count general low-income population
0
Count Very low income (as classified by the authors)
0
Count welfare population
0
Count long-term welfare recipients
0
Count Asian
0
Count Black or African American
0
Count Hispanic or Latino of any race
0
Count American Indian or Alaska Native
0
Count Pacific islander
0
Count White
0
Count More than one race
0
Count Unknown race
0
Percent female
92.80
Percent Male
7.20
Percent No high school diploma or GED
54.30
Percent With a high school diploma or GED
45.70
Percent Married
6.80
Percent Parents
100.00
Percent Single Parents
100.00
Percent Employed
9.50
Percent Unemployed
90.50
Percent welfare population
100.00
Percent Black or African American
31.20
Percent Hispanic or Latino of any race
45.20
Percent American Indian or Alaska Native
0.30
Percent White
17.30
Percent unknown race
6.10
Mean age
33.00
Group formation formatted

Nearly 21,000 prospective Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC) recipients in Los Angeles County who attended a program orientation at a county office from April 1 to September 11, 1996, and who were not exempt from welfare-to-work program participation, were randomly assigned either to Jobs-First GAIN or to the comparison group. Exemptions were granted for individuals who had a disabling condition, were employed full time, or resided in a rural area with no access to services, and for women who were in the second or third trimester of pregnancy. Both single-parent and two-parent households were included in the evaluation; this review focuses on the sample of 15,683 single parents. Most study participants were randomly assigned in order from a wait list, but a few participants requested and were allowed to jump to the top of the list. The participants that jumped to the top of the list were still randomly assigned to either the Jobs-First GAIN or comparison group.

Study timing formatted

The Jobs-First GAIN program began in 1996 and concluded in 1999. This report estimates impacts after two years of follow-up.

Study funding formatted

The Los Angeles County Department of Public Social Services commissioned the evaluation, with support from the Office of Planning, Research, and Evaluation in the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and the Ford Foundation.

Sample Characteristics

About 93 percent of single-parent sample members were female. Fewer than half (45.7 percent) had earned a high school diploma or general education diploma, and 90 percent were unemployed at the time of randomization. Sample members were predominantly Hispanic (45.2 percent) and African American (31.2 percent); about one-fifth (20.3 percent) demonstrated limited English proficiency. The average sample member was 33.2 years old and had two children.

Implementing organization formatted

Los Angeles County Department of Public Social Services (county AFDC agency)

Program history

Starting in 1988, Los Angeles launched a GAIN program focused primarily on basic education rather than job search activities. Evaluations of the original GAIN program indicated that education was costly and did not produce substantial increases in employment or reductions in welfare receipt. As a result, the county Department of Public Social Services modified the program between 1993 and 1995 to emphasize rapid return to work.

Treatment condition formatted

Applicants to or recipients of AFDC who were assigned to the GAIN group participated in a program strongly emphasizing a rapid return to work, even in low-wage positions. The program orientation reinforced this message through a six-hour motivational meeting. The program then provided job development activities, including three-week job clubs comprised of classroom sessions focused on job application techniques and a supervised job search. Program officials also provided job development, vocational skills assessment, basic education, vocational training, or work experience, depending on the program member's needs.

Comparison condition formatted

Applicants to or recipients of AFDC who were not assigned to the GAIN group could not participate in any GAIN-related activities and did not receive the strong work-first motivation. They did remain eligible to receive welfare and Food Stamps payments.

Mandatory services formatted

Single parents with children older than 3 were required to participate.

Timing of study formatted

The initial job club took place over three weeks. Further job development services were available until the recipient found work, exited the welfare system, or both.

Program funding formatted

The intervention was funded by state and county AFDC.

Setting details formatted

The program took place in Los Angeles County, CA, through the Los Angeles County Department of Public Social Services.

Delivered by public or private entity?
Public
Secondary domains examined

Physical health, Housing, Nutrition, Family formation, Child well-being

Earliest publication year
1999
Most recent publication year
2000
Manuscripts
Check edits flag
No
Primary Service
Work-readiness activities
Enrollment Period
April 1996 to September 1996
Subgroup data - Hispanic
No
Intervention Cost
$6251
Comparison cost
$4229