Submitted by user on
Study Name
Minnesota Department of Corrections Work Release Program
Study Sharepoint ID
8090
Evaluation name
Effectiveness of a Minnesota prison work release program
Strength of Evidence Tag
Reason for the Rating

This study received a low study quality rating because it is a quasi-experimental design that does not adjust estimated impacts for potentially important differences between the intervention and comparison groups.

This study received a low study quality rating because it is a quasi-experimental design that does not adjust estimated impacts for potentially important differences between the intervention and comparison groups.

Settings in which the intervention was studied
Count age
0
Count Young Adults
0
Count Hard-to-employ
0
Count Disability
0
Count chronically ill
0
Count mentally ill
0
Count substance dependent
0
Count formerly incarcerated
0
Count Justice involved
0
Count limited work history
0
Count homeless
0
Count immigrants
0
Count refugees
0
Count veterans
0
Count female
0
Count Male
0
Count Any postsecondary education
0
Count With a high school diploma or GED
0
Count No high school diploma or GED
0
Count Married
0
Count Parents
0
Count Single Parents
0
Count Non-Custodial Parents
0
Count Employed
0
Count Self employed
0
Count Unemployed
0
Count Disconnected/discouraged workers
0
Count general low-income population
0
Count Very low income (as classified by the authors)
0
Count welfare population
0
Count long-term welfare recipients
0
Count Asian
0
Count Black or African American
0
Count Hispanic or Latino of any race
0
Count American Indian or Alaska Native
0
Count Pacific islander
0
Count White
0
Count More than one race
0
Count Unknown race
0
Count another race
0
Percent fomerly incarcerated
100.00
Percent Justice involved
100.00
Group formation formatted

In Minnesota, people who were incarcerated could participate in a work release program if they had served at least half of their prison sentence and were within eight months of their release date. To participate in work release, individuals were assessed for low recidivism risk based on their criminal history, prison behavioral history, or their score on the Level of Service Inventory–Revised instrument. People who were incarcerated could apply for the work release program when they were within one year of their supervised release date. Minnesota Department of Corrections staff then screened the applications and approved applicants for work release. The study authors used propensity score matching to create the intervention and comparison groups. The authors matched 1,785 individuals who (1) were released from Minnesota prisons between January 2007 and December 2010 and (2) participated in Minnesota's work release program to 1,785 individuals (from a larger pool of 6,841 nonparticipants) released during the same time period who did not participate in the work release program. Matching and analysis was completed at the individual level.

Study timing formatted

Offenders included in the study were released between January 2007 and December 2010, and follow-up data were collected until December 31, 2012. The follow-up period ranged from two to six years.

Study funding formatted

Authors did not receive funding for this study.

Sample Characteristics

The study authors did not provide sample characteristics.

Implementing organization formatted

Minnesota Department of Corrections

Program history

Minnesota's work release program was established in 1967.

Treatment condition formatted

The goal of Minnesota's work release program, operated by the Minnesota Department of Corrections, was to help low-risk people who were incarcerated transition from prison to the community. Through this program, people who were incarcerated were released early and transferred from a state facility to a county jail or community corrections residential facility. Work release participants had to obtain employment, and they were referred to programs in the community that help formerly incarcerated people develop job-search skills if they had difficulty finding work. During work release, participants had to use a portion of their income to pay for some of their work release housing costs and court-ordered restitution.

Comparison condition formatted

People in the comparison condition were people who were incarcerated and were eligible for Minnesota's work release program but did not participate. They received typical services available to incarcerated and formerly incarcerated people.

Mandatory services formatted

None

Timing of study formatted

The average participant took part in work release for a little more than four months.

Setting details formatted

The program took place in Minnesota. Participants applied while they were incarcerated in state prison. After they began the program, they were moved to a county jail or community corrections residential facility.

Delivered by public or private entity?
Public
Secondary domains examined

Recidivism

Earliest publication year
2015
Most recent publication year
2015
Manuscripts
Check edits flag
Yes
Editor comments

See group formation.

See treatment condition.

Intervention Duration
4.00