Submitted by user on
Study Name
EMPLOY
Study Sharepoint ID
8964
Evaluation name
EMPLOY
Intervention (standard name)
Strength of Evidence Tag
Reason for the Rating

This study received a low study quality rating because it is a quasi-experimental design that does not adjust estimated impacts for potentially important differences between the intervention and comparison groups.

This study received a low study quality rating because it is a quasi-experimental design that does not adjust estimated impacts for potentially important differences between the intervention and comparison groups.

Settings in which the intervention was studied
Count age
0
Count Young Adults
0
Count Hard-to-employ
0
Count Disability
0
Count chronically ill
0
Count mentally ill
0
Count substance dependent
0
Count formerly incarcerated
0
Count Justice involved
0
Count limited work history
0
Count homeless
0
Count immigrants
0
Count refugees
0
Count veterans
0
Count female
0
Count Male
0
Count Any postsecondary education
0
Count With a high school diploma or GED
0
Count No high school diploma or GED
0
Count Married
0
Count Parents
0
Count Single Parents
0
Count Non-Custodial Parents
0
Count Employed
0
Count Self employed
0
Count Unemployed
0
Count Disconnected/discouraged workers
0
Count general low-income population
0
Count Very low income (as classified by the authors)
0
Count welfare population
0
Count long-term welfare recipients
0
Count Asian
0
Count Black or African American
0
Count Hispanic or Latino of any race
0
Count American Indian or Alaska Native
0
Count Pacific islander
0
Count White
0
Count More than one race
0
Count Unknown race
0
Percent long-term welfare recipients
100.00
Percent general low-income population
100.00
Group formation formatted

People who were incarcerated, were within five years of the end of their sentence, and had at least six months of work experience through the state's prison industry program (Minnesota Correctional Industries) were eligible to participate in EMPLOY. Participation in EMPLOY was voluntary and required submitting an application. The study authors used propensity score matching to match 232 EMPLOY participants in the intervention group to 232 nonparticipants in the comparison group (out of 3,959 individuals who did not participate). All study participants were released from Minnesota prisons between 2006 and 2008.

Study timing formatted

Individuals included in the study were released from prison between July 2006 and December 2008, and follow-up data were collected until the end of June 2010. Individuals received services for 12 months after release.

Study funding formatted

The authors did not receive any funding for this study.

Sample Characteristics

All study participants were released from a Minnesota prison after June 2006 but before January 2009. In the intervention group, most participants were male (78 percent), and the average age at release was 37. About half of intervention group participants were not White (46 percent). In the comparison group, most participants were male (81 percent), and the average age was about 35. About half of intervention group participants were not White (43 percent).

Implementing organization formatted

Minnesota Correctional Industries

Program history

EMPLOY was implemented in 2006. Study participants were released from prison during or after July 2006.

Treatment condition formatted

The EMPLOY program aimed to help people incarcerated in Minnesota prisons obtain and retain employment. People in the intervention group received EMPLOY services during the last 60 to 90 days of their prison sentence and for a year after their release. After being accepted into EMPLOY, participants met with a job training specialist for two eight-hour sessions to go over job search preparation and techniques and interviewing skills. During the last week before participants' release, a job development specialist searched for job leads, located open positions, and communicated with potential employers. After participants were released from prison, they had an appointment with a retention specialist in their community to receive a portfolio with their resume, certification from EMPLOY, job leads, and other tools like bus fare and clothes for interviews. Retention specialists conducted 1-, 3-, 6-, and 12-month follow-up meetings with participants.

Comparison condition formatted

The comparison group included people who were eligible for EMPLOY but did not participate in the program. They received standard reintegration services.

Mandatory services formatted

None

Timing of study formatted

Participants received services in the last 60 to 90 days of their prison sentence and for a full year after their release.

Program funding formatted

Not available

Setting details formatted

The study look place in Minnesota prisons and the communities to which ex-offenders were released.

Delivered by public or private entity?
Private
Secondary domains examined

Recidivism

Earliest publication year
2015
Most recent publication year
2015
Manuscripts
Check edits flag
No
Intervention Duration
15.00