Submitted by user on
Study Name
Grand Rapids Labor Force Attachment (LFA) Program (as compared with Grand Rapids Human Capital Development [HCD] Program)
Study Sharepoint ID
3131.06
Evaluation name
National Evaluation of Welfare-to-Work Strategies (NEWWS)
Strength of Evidence Tag
Reason for the Rating

This study received a high study quality rating because it is a low-attrition randomized controlled trial with no known issues that suggest the findings cannot be attributed to the intervention.

This study received a high study quality rating because it is a low-attrition randomized controlled trial with no known issues that suggest the findings cannot be attributed to the intervention.

Settings in which the intervention was studied
Characteristics
Percent female
95.80
Percent Male
4.20
Percent Any postsecondary education
5.00
Percent No high school diploma or GED
40.90
Percent With a high school diploma or GED
59.10
Percent Parents
100.00
Percent Single Parents
100.00
Percent Employed
11.40
Percent welfare population
100.00
Percent Black or African American
39.30
Percent Hispanic or Latino of any race
8.00
Percent American Indian or Alaska Native
1.50
Percent White
50.10
Percent unknown race
1.10
Mean age
28.20
Group formation formatted

Evaluators randomly assigned a total of 4,554 single-parent Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC) recipients who were required to enroll in the Job Opportunities and Basic Skills (JOBS) program in Grand Rapids into the Labor Force Attachment (LFA) program, the Human Capital Development (HCD) program, or the comparison group. The random assignment occurred between September 1991 and January 1994 and followed a JOBS orientation (which not all JOBS-mandatory individuals attended, but they faced sanctions for failing to appear). AFDC recipients were exempt if they had children younger than 1, had three or more children under age 10, were employed 30 hours or more per week, were medically unable to work, were in the last trimester of pregnancy, resided in a mental institution at all during the previous five years, had been enrolled in a rehabilitation center, or were taking medication for a mental illness. Voluntary JOBS participants were not randomly assigned and were excluded from the analysis. The study included two- and five-year follow-up surveys of randomly selected individuals who were randomly assigned between March 1992 and January 1994. This review focuses on LFA versus HCD. Other reviews contrast LFA and the comparison condition and HCD and the comparison condition.

Study timing formatted

Individuals were randomly assigned between September 1991 and January 1994. The study reports impacts five years after random assignment.

Study funding formatted

This study is part of the National Evaluation of Welfare-to-Work Strategies (NEWWS). The NEWWS evaluation was funded by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation and Office of Planning, Research, and Evaluation) and by the U.S. Department of Education.

Sample Characteristics

Among the 4,554 study participants (1,557 in the LFA program; 1,542 in the HCD program; and 1,455 in the comparison group), nearly 96 percent were female. The average age of study participants at the outset of the study was 28 years old. More than half of the participants were White, and almost 40 percent were Black. Nearly 58 percent were never married. Families had between 1 and 2 children, on average. Almost half (46 percent) of parents had some earnings in the past 12 months, and about 11 percent were employed at random assignment. Nearly 60 percent of parents had received a high school diploma or GED, and about 39 percent of parents were enrolled in education or training in the past 12 months. More than 99 percent received some AFDC benefits at the time of random assignment.

Implementing organization formatted

Michigan Department of Health and Human Services

Program history

NEWWS aimed to analyze the effectiveness of 11 mandatory welfare-to-work programs in 7 sites across the United States.

Treatment condition formatted

The Grand Rapids LFA program encouraged clients to move quickly into work without being selective about which job to take. Participants spent two weeks in a job club operated by public school staff, then began applying to jobs for up to three weeks. Participants who did not find a job during this period participated in unpaid work experiences, more job searching, vocational training, or basic education. Participants who completed job club but remained unemployed could receive multiple rounds of short-term education or vocational training for periods of nine months. Case managers focused primarily on monitoring and enforcing participation and could impose financial sanctions for nonparticipation. Child care and transportation assistance were available.

Comparison condition formatted

The HCD program focused on providing education and training. Staff stressed that clients should spend time receiving education or training to prepare them for good jobs. The program began with a 15-hour, weeklong formal assessment component, during which public school staff assessed participants’ achievement, aptitude, and career interests. Participants then usually completed either high school completion programs (distinct from GED classes) or vocational training. If participants did not have a high school diploma or GED, the program provided basic education classes in the public school system to help participants make progress toward their goals (such as increasing their literacy level or obtaining a GED certificate). As with the LFA program, case managers focused primarily on monitoring and enforcing participation and could impose financial sanctions for nonparticipation. Child care and transportation assistance were available.

Mandatory services formatted

AFDC could be decreased if clients did not comply with program requirements.

Timing of study formatted

For the LFA group, job clubs lasted for about one month, and clients who completed job club but remained unemployed could receive multiple rounds of short-term education or vocational training for nine months. The study did not specify how long the program monitored clients to examine whether a sanction should be applied to their case.

Program funding formatted

NEWWS programs were funded by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services through the Family Support Act.

Setting details formatted

The study took place in Grand Rapids, MI.

Delivered by public or private entity?
Public
Secondary domains examined

None

Earliest publication year
1997
Most recent publication year
2001
Manuscripts
Check edits flag
No
Primary Service
Work-readiness activities
Enrollment Period
September 1991 to January 1994
Intervention Duration
24.00
Intervention Cost
$11623
Comparison cost
$13947